• Join Our Newsletter
Donate
  • A
  • A
  • A
  • Patient Empowerment Network
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • Youtube
    • For Patients
      • Blood Cancers
        • Leukemia
          • Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
          • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
        • Lymphoma
          • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)
            • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
            • Follicular Lymphoma (FL)
            • Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
        • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)
        • Multiple Myeloma
      • Solid Tumor Cancers
        • Bladder Cancer
        • Breast Cancer
        • Colon Cancer
        • Gynecological Cancers
        • Head & Neck Cancer
        • Lung Cancer
        • Prostate Cancer
        • Renal Medullary Carcinoma (RMC)
        • Skin Cancer
        • Thyroid Cancer
      • General Cancer Information
        • All General Cancer Information
        • Health Policy Activity Guide
        • digital sherpa™
          • digital sherpa™
          • Digitally Empowered™
    • For Care Partners
    • For Providers/Professionals
      • Becoming Empowered
      • Empowering Providers to Empower Patients (EPEP)
        • Lung Cancer | Empowering Providers to Empower Patients (EPEP)
    • Events
    • Blog
    • About
      • Mission
      • 2023 Programs
      • Staff, Board, and Volunteers
      • Annual Report
      • The Value of PEN
      • Partners
    • Contact
    • Get Involved
      • Volunteer as an Empowerment Lead
      • Become a Donor or Fundraiser
      • Join the Board
    • Donate
    • Search
    • Menu Menu
    American Cancer Society Lodging Programs

    How to Serve on a Scientific Review Panel as a Patient Advocate

    October 3, 2019/in General Health Info, General Resource WN, General What's Next /by PEN Editorial Staff
    Bookmark (0)

    Please login to bookmark

    No account yet? Register

    This resource was originally published by Cancer Today Mag.com by Bob Riter, Monica Vakiner and Carole Baas, here.

    Cancer patient advocates who review research proposals can provide valuable perspective.

    by Bob Riter, Monica Vakiner and Carole Baas

    ​Image​ by OnBlast​ / iStock / Getty Images Plus

    WHILE IT’S MOST COMMON ​to hear about cancer patients getting involved in research by enrolling in clinical trials, patients and others affected by cancer can also help shape the direction of research by serving on scientific review panels.

    These panels bring together experts to analyze research proposals to help determine which ideas will receive funding. Several organizations and government programs, including the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and Susan G. Komen, provide opportunities for grant review to patient advocates, including cancer survivors, patients and caregivers.

    Opportunities to Apply Yourself

    Advocates interested in becoming involved in a research review panel can explore options with government agencies and nonprofit organizations, including patient advocacy organizations that provide research funding for various projects.​

    • Funding organizations such as the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute​ allow advocates to apply online to serve as reviewers.
    • Intensive training programs such as the American Association for Cancer Research Scientist↔Survivor Program or the National Breast Cancer Coalition Project LEAD help advocates learn more about the science of cancer.
    • The Cancer Information Support Network, Cochrane Training and Research Advocacy Network offer online learning opportunities for patient advocates who want to learn more about inter​preting research.

    ​While scientists and clinicians on panels analyze the science, patient advocates judge the merit of the study from a more personal vantage point, guided by a basic question: “Will the study make a difference in the lives of patients?” Everyone on the panel has an equal voice and vote to rank the research applications.​ ​

    Initial Review

    Advocates who are selected to be a part of a scientific review panel usually participate in an introductory phone call or webinar hosted by the panel organizers, who provide an overview of the process and answer any questions. Some review panels pair novice patient advocates with experienced advocate mentors. In these cases, novices can connect with and get feedback from their mentors.

    Scientific review panels typically have a mix of approximately 20 scientists and two to four advocates. While each panel has its own process for review depending on the funding organization, panelists typically review approximately five to 10 research proposals, providing comments and scores. These research proposals generally include sections that describe the research plan, the researchers’ qualifications, a timeline, a budget and letters of support from the organizations where the researchers work.

    Advocates are not expected to understand each scientific detail in these proposals. Rather, they focus on the potential impact of the research on the patient community. For example, advocates are well suited to offer feedback on the lay abstract, the one-page overview of the proposal written in nontechnical language. These abstracts provide a general idea of the research and demonstrate the researchers’ ability to communicate with a broader audience.

    In addition, patient advocates can ask several important questions about the research: Does the grant application have a clear hypothesis? Does the researcher make a compelling case that the research is important? Do the researchers and institutions where they work have track records that demonstrate the research will be completed? Do the letters of support indicating institutional backing seem enthusiastic?

    Optimize Your Time

    Follow these practical tips to make an impact on scientific review panels.​

    ​Further CollaborationOnce the initial scoring is tabulated, panelists meet again—either virtually or in person. For example, the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs hold meetings for one to two days in the Washington, D.C., area. During the meeting, each panel reviews the top-scoring 20 to 30 applications in its assigned subject area.

    The committee chair and a scientific review officer keep the panel focused and on schedule. The reviewers go over their rationales for scoring decisions for the proposals they initially reviewed. After discussion, panelists score each proposal.

    The proposals are then rank-ordered based on the scoring and often referred to a different committee (commonly known as a program committee or integration panel) for final funding decisions. This committee takes a broad view and makes sure that awards are consistent with criteria outlined in the call for grant proposals. A few months later, the grant awards are typically announced on the funding organization’s website.

    Serving on a scientific review panel allows advocates to influence the direction of research and to learn from—and become friends with—esteemed researchers and clinicians. Including advocates as collaborators with scientists and clinicians provides a wonderful synergy, reminding all parties involved that, in addition to being a disease that affects cells, cancer is also a disease that affects people.​ ​

    Bob Riter, a stage II breast cancer survivor, is a patient advocate with Cornell University Physical Sciences Oncology Center in Ithaca, New York. Monica Vakiner, a stage II invasive ductal carcinoma and lobular breast cancer survivor, serves as the director of client services at the Cancer Resource Center of the Finger Lakes in Ithaca. Carole Baas, a ductal carcinoma in situ survivor who lives in Southlake, Texas, is the national advocate for the Physical Sciences-Oncology Network of the National Cancer Institute.​

    Tags: Geeral Resource WN, patient advocate
    Share this entry
    • Share on Facebook
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on WhatsApp
    • Share on Pinterest
    • Share on LinkedIn
    • Share on Tumblr
    • Share on Reddit
    • Share by Mail
    https://powerfulpatients.org/pen/wp-content/uploads/2-9.png 600 600 PEN Editorial Staff https://www.powerfulpatients.org/pen/wp-content/uploads/New-Logo-300x126.png PEN Editorial Staff2019-10-03 11:28:272022-11-08 14:07:44How to Serve on a Scientific Review Panel as a Patient Advocate
    You might also like
    What Do You Do When Your Doctor Tells You Not To GoogleWhat Do You Do When Your Doctor Tells You Not To Google?
    Managing Medical MistrustManaging Medical Mistrust: Creating a Healthy, Trust-Based System
    Participating in a Clinical Trial: What You Need to KnowParticipating in a Clinical Trial: What You Need to Know
    A Patient Shares Her Clinical Trial ExperienceA Patient Shares Her Clinical Trial Experience
    Self-Education Is The Basis of Better Health Outcomes, Physically, Mentally, and FinanciallySelf-Education Is the Basis of Better Health Outcomes, Physically, Mentally, and Financially
    Ten Things You Should Never Say To A Person With Cancer...Ten Things You Should Never Say To A Person With Cancer…And One Thing You Should

    Recent Posts

    • Negotiating Debt, Managing Your Finances and Gaining Financial SecurityNegotiating Debt, Managing Your Finances and Gaining Financial SecurityMarch 22, 2023 - 10:24 am
    • March 2023 Notable NewsMarch 2023 Notable NewsMarch 20, 2023 - 4:35 pm
    • The Power of Shared-Decision Making: A New Revolution of CareThe Power of Shared-Decision Making: A New Revolution of CareMarch 20, 2023 - 11:11 am
    • Self-Advocacy and Self-Education #patientchat Highlights#patientchat Highlights – Self-Advocacy and Self-EducationMarch 17, 2023 - 12:04 pm
    • Hospital Charity Programs: What You Need to KnowHospital Charity Programs: What You Need to KnowMarch 17, 2023 - 11:59 am
    Patient Empowerment Network
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER DONATE

    CONNECT WITH US

    Ecologi 6mo Badge

    © 2023 Patient Empowerment Network, a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
    Inclusion Policy | Privacy Policy | Corporate Giving Policy
    Scroll to top