Addressing Disparities in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Bladder cancer disparities have been examined for several decades. Expert Dr. Shaakir Hasan from Beth Israel Lahey Health discusses patient groups that show disparities and patient advice to advocate for optimal care.
See More from [ACT]IVATED Bladder Cancer
Download Resource Guide | Descargar Guía
Related Programs:
Navigating Bladder Cancer Treatment: Understanding the Role of Academic and Community Centers |
Improving Access to Bladder Cancer Care: Impact of Insurance and Socioeconomic Factors |
|
Transcript:
Lisa Hatfield:
Dr. Hasan, what are the most significant disparities that you’ve observed in the treatment of bladder cancer among different demographic groups?
Dr. Shaakir Hasan:
Yeah, so you know, unfortunately, we did find, and actually, before I even start, let me preface this by saying there was a study done about three decades ago, the early ‘90s, that looked at the diagnosis and prognosis of bladder cancer patients in the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s. And they found that there was a worse prognosis for African Americans, particular other minorities, but mostly African Americans, both when it comes to diagnosis, like they were diagnosed later, and then their outcomes, they had worse survival, worse cure rate. And I’m sorry to say that we repeated the study, they use theory data. It’s a national database, and we use the National Cancer Database, NCDB to do a similar study, looking much later. So we did this a few years back. And so we’re looking at the 2000s, 2010s, up to 2020.
Unfortunately, we actually found the same results. The overall prognosis is better, because the overall treatment and management is better. But the differences, unfortunately, still remain. So, Black patients were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed in later stages, i.e., stage IV, incurable stages than their white counterparts. And that obviously means that they’re going to, there’s going to be worse outcomes when it comes to cure rates and survival, overall survival. And so we still do see that today.
Lisa Hatfield:
Okay. Thank you for that information. I also have a follow-up question to that, because I read your study a little bit and learned a little bit more about some of the factors that lead to a later diagnosis. So if you have a patient sitting in front of you who is afraid maybe to, maybe they’re going in, they have blood in their urine, which is a symptom, could be a symptom of bladder cancer. Their PCP has told them originally, well, it might just be, you might be on your period, it could be something else, they go in once or twice, a patient is afraid to confront their doctor or say, you know, is there any way we can follow up on more, maybe they don’t want to offend their doctor, maybe they’re just afraid to do it. Do you have any piece of advice for that patient, just so they don’t get diagnosed in a later stage, if that is the reason why they might be diagnosed later, what would your advice be to that patient sitting there?
Dr. Shaakir Hasan:
Yeah, totally. So I think one would be surprised. First of all, never worry about offending your doctor. You know, that’s one thing that I start with. And it’s, and I say that a little tongue in cheek, but I actually mean that because there have been plenty of times where your doctor’s not trying to be dismissive, right? They’re not trying to just, obviously, you never want to be the one that missed something. You never want to be the one that bladder cancer, right?
And so you might just not be thinking about something at that moment, you might really be sitting there and going, oh, look, it’s very likely not this because I know my list of diagnoses. And I know like, what’s more common and what’s not, that’s part of my job. And so it’s not so much, you know, the attempts to offend or miss something. But the second you bring it up, the second that you advocate for yourself, far more likely, we’re far more likely to act on it.
And that’s just kind of a universal principle. There might be something that they missed, there might be, maybe you’re perimenopausal, and you haven’t had menses in a couple years, and the doctor just missed that. There could be something that you, you know your body, you should advocate for yourself in those situations, do not worry about offending, because honestly, you’re not like, I can’t really imagine I couldn’t, I’ll admit, there definitely been times where someone asked about something that I wasn’t thinking about, not intentionally. And I just Oh, yeah, of course, we’ll look into that. There’s no offense, you know, taken. So I wouldn’t worry about that.
And even if they were offended, this is your body, it could be life or death, you shouldn’t worry about that. The second thing I want to mention, though, is that, you know, it’s probably not as likely that everyone is seeking medical care, and then one is just being dismissed certainly is possible. Certainly, we do have evidence of that happening, and unfortunately in different situations, but it’s probably more a reflection of certain people will have primary care and certain people just don’t.
If you don’t have insurance, for example, you’re not as likely to go have a routine checkup. And these routine checkups, they’ll check the urine, they’ll do urinalysis, and you might not notice blood in the urine, but they can tell it microscopically. But if you’re not routinely doing this, as a screening process, then you’re not going to detect it. And so I think one recurring theme in healthcare in general is just preventive medicine. And I think that we really have to work hard to implement that for all groups. And certainly, there’s a disproportionate lower primary care coverage of certain minorities and socioeconomic groups that we really have to do better at. And I think that will translate into detecting more bladder cancer earlier for whatever ethnic group you want to.
