Tag Archive for: Latinx patients

Do Black and Latinx Veterans Face Unique Lung Cancer Challenges?

Do Black and Latinx Veterans Face Unique Lung Cancer Challenges? from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

What unique challenges do Black and Latinx veterans face in lung cancer? Expert Dr. Drew Moghanaki from UCLA Health explains the importance of trust, second opinions, and proactive advice for the best care.

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…for anyone who might have some trust concerns. No one owns you as a provider that you have to get care from them. If you’re comfortable, you can ask for a second opinion. If not, it is absolutely okay. Patients all the time are getting second and sometimes even third opinions. And I strongly recommend getting another opinion if you’ve got any questions or doubts, because that trust alliance is so important to get the best lung cancer care…”

Download Resource Guide | Descargar guía de recursos

See More from [ACT]IVATED NSCLC Veterans

Related Resources:

How Can Advanced Lung Cancer Be Explained to Newly Diagnosed Veterans?

How Can Advanced Lung Cancer Be Explained to Newly Diagnosed Veterans?

Lung Cancer Strategies for Veterans | Research and Care Insights

Lung Cancer Strategies for Veterans | Research and Care Insights

Insights into Veteran Healthcare | Perspectives from VA and Civilian Systems

Insights into Veteran Healthcare | Perspectives from VA and Civilian Systems

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Moghanaki, what specific challenges do veterans from the Black and Latinx communities face when trying to access healthcare services, and what are we learning from these challenges, and how is that information shaping care for veterans facing lung cancer?

Dr. Drew Moghanaki:

Well, this question just reminds me that healthcare is complicated, especially lung cancer care. And the most important thing for anybody getting care, regardless of what social, economic background or ethnic background they may be from, is to find a team that you trust and who you know will care about you. And that’s the best way to make sure you get the best treatment. I myself as a physician. I’ve also been a patient at times.  And if I don’t trust my care provider, I basically ask for a change. And I know that can be difficult.

And so here’s my activation tip for anyone who might have some trust concerns. No one owns you as a provider that you have to get care from them. If you’re comfortable, you can ask for a second opinion. If not, it is absolutely okay. Patients all the time are getting second and sometimes even third opinions. And I strongly recommend getting another opinion if you’ve got any questions or doubt, because that trust alliance is so important to get the best lung cancer care, because it’s not going to be a one-time visit. You were talking about relationships that can last months or even years to get the best treatment for your lung cancer.


Share Your Feedback

Create your own user feedback survey

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care?

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care? from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

With non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) precision medicine, what are disparities and strategies to equitable access? Expert Dr. Samuel Cykert from UNC School of Medicine discusses disparities, strategies to overcome disparities, and proactive patient advice toward optimal care.

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…I know you do electronic health records, and as soon as this visit is done, you have data about my visit, so have you thought about creating a real-time registry to see how I’m progressing with my care and see how others are progressing with their care, whether to make sure that we don’t have missed appointments and to make sure that I’m not falling behind where I should be.”

Download Resource Guide | Descargar guía de recursos

See More from [ACT]IVATED Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Related Resources:

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients

Empowering Lung Cancer Patients | Embracing Hope, Treatment, and Teamwork

Empowering Lung Cancer Patients | Embracing Hope, Treatment, and Teamwork

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Cykert, are there any disparities in access to biomarker testing for Black and Latinx patients with lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups, and if so, what strategies or initiatives can be implemented to address these disparities and promote equitable access to precision medicine?

Dr. Samuel Cykert:

Yeah, biomarker testing followed up by precision medicine is really fairly new in the last half-dozen years, so there haven’t been a lot of studies done looking at how well we’re doing in different groups, but there’s a journal called The Journal of Clinical Oncology and precision medicine that published such a study in 2022.

And what that showed…and again, keep in mind that in a lot of…as they do in a lot of database studies, they are a couple of years behind, but what they showed in looking at the cases of over 20,000 patients, is that on first time testing, we talked about initial biopsies, when the initial biopsy is tested, there is actually about a 7 percent difference between Black and white patients with the white number being only 37 percent and the Black number being 30 percent, so that was low all the way around.

And then if you look at any biomolecular testing at any stage of the cancer, those numbers change to around 55 percent for white patients and 44 percent for Black patients, and I want to point out that for Asian patients and Latinx patients, the numbers were also low, but there weren’t enough patients in the database to achieve statistical significance, but it looks like things are going in the wrong direction there too, and when you think about it, in the state of the right now, those numbers ought to be close to 100 percent for everybody, at least in some of the basic markers like ALK and EGFR and PD-L1.

So there’s a lot of work to do. So there is a disparity. It has been documented, but we’re not getting perfect care to even anyone, and in the ACCURE (Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity) Study that I had described a little bit earlier, where we did an intervention, we created real-time transparency through up-to-date electronic health records and digital data of where patients were in their care, we were able to create a real-time registry to know what had been done for every patient, and in the case of precision medicine, this would be so easy, because you basically put every patient that’s had a lung cancer biopsy in the registry, then you have another column in the registry tested for X, tested for Y, tested for Z, and then you have a next column that says, treated for X, treated for Y, and treated for Z. We have the digital information now to do all this in real time, and we have to build the systems to do it.

Lisa Hatfield:

Could you share any examples of successful initiatives or programs aimed at improving the implementation of biomarker testing in lung cancer and what factors contribute to the success of these initiatives, and how can they be replicated or scaled in other healthcare settings?

Dr. Samuel Cykert:

I’ll have to plead my ignorance on this question because I haven’t talked to enough cancer centers on whether or not they’re creating real-time registries for whether all their patients with probable lung cancer are, [a] getting biopsied promptly, [b] getting biomarker testing, and then following those patients over time to see if they’re getting the treatments to match to that, so I know that at my own institution at the University of North Carolina Lineberger Cancer Center, we’re actively talking about building these systems, but we haven’t built them yet.

And so going back to the work that our UNC team has done in partnership with Greensboro Health Disparities Collaborative, we’ve done an intervention with real-time transparency in lung cancer treatment and breast cancer treatment, and real-time quality improvement and audit and feedback for accountability in those treatments and using navigation, particularly for high risk patients to make sure that they’re able to follow through with their diagnosis and treatment.

So with that combination in lung cancer, we got almost perfect care, 96 percent and 95 percent completing treatment, so there’s no reason that the same system cannot be applied to biomarker testing and biologic and immunotherapy, and we need to look at it and implement it and apply it as soon as possible, because when you think about all this, and I’m not just talking about cancer, but when you’re thinking about the whole picture, when you look at, for instance, Black, white disparities, whether it’s in cardiovascular care, whether it’s in diabetes, whether it’s in cancer care, if you look at the result of that in one year, if we brought up care to benchmark levels of the Black community on all those things, we would save 74,000 lives a year.

That’s incredibly impactful. And we need to quicken up the pace of doing this. I’ve been a disparities researcher and intervention researcher for over 20 years, and people really haven’t taken note of really doing interventions until the last five or six years. We need to pay attention, we need to move. It’s important. People’s lives depend on it. And care improved for everyone with these systems, it improved for white patients too. It’s not a zero-sum game.

Lisa Hatfield:

I’m wondering, as a patient, is there anything that I can do or that a patient can do to request or to ask if they use real-time data, that institution to help with the treatment or help with testing or whatever, is there a question the patient might be able to ask to ensure the real-time data is used? Because I imagine it’s not being used as often, so it could be, like you said, there probably isn’t a system in place.

Dr. Samuel Cykert:

Here’s my double activation tip. So at an institution, you don’t know if you have a problem until you look. So the first problem is, as I go back and look behind, am I making sure whether or not I’m seeing disparities, whether it’s a man, woman, Black, white, Latinx, do we have disparities in our treatment application and treatment outcomes in our institution? Because if we look at that, we can start brainstorming on how to possibly fix it, and then the second thing is, I know you do electronic health records, and as soon as this visit is done, you have data about my visit, so have you thought about creating a real-time registry to see how I’m progressing with my care and see how others are progressing with their care, whether to make sure that we don’t have missed appointments and to make sure that I’m not falling behind where I should be.

Lisa Hatfield:

Great, that’s perfect, thank you. Having the patients be…have that accountability too, to ask the question, if that exists, that real-time data, if there’s a way to use that. So thank you, I appreciate that myself personally, so thanks. 


Share Your Feedback

Create your own user feedback survey

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

What are the barriers for rural patients hoping to access biomarker tests? Dr. Samuel Cykert discusses the barriers for underrepresented lung cancer patients in rural areas face in accessing biomarker testing, citing issues like health insurance, economics, and language.

Download Resource Guide | Descargar guía de recursos

See More from [ACT]IVATED Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Related Resources:

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care?

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care?

What Urgent Innovations Can Advance Lung Cancer Precision Medicine?

What Urgent Innovations Can Advance Lung Cancer Precision Medicine?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Cykert, one of the main barriers preventing Black and Latinx patients with lung cancer in rural areas from accessing biomarker testing, and what steps can be taken to address these barriers, including improving awareness, affordability, and availability of testing facilities?

Dr. Samuel Cykert:

Yeah, great, great question. There are several issues here. One is the issue of rural, and the other issue is patients of color who may have barriers of health insurance, barriers of economics, barriers of education, and especially in the case of Latinx folks, barriers of language. So it really is a multiple question, but one thing for sure is we know from past studies that technology diffusion is slow and tends to get out to rural areas later than other areas, and the other problem is treatment volume in rural areas.

So a lot of rural hospitals don’t do bio specimen testing, don’t have the capability of doing that, and so you have this kind of double whammy of low volume testing plus low volume treatment, it’s well-known that surgeons who do more operations, for instance, do better. So given all those factors, I would recommend that rural patients who have presumptive diagnosis of lung cancer, even a suspicion of lung cancer, for instance, a large mass, a greater than 2 centimeter mass on an x-ray or a CT scan, that those patients ask to be referred to the closest high volume center.

I think that’s an important step, and we also have to have close interactions with our rural colleagues so that they’re comfortable of treating aggressively things that are well-treatable in the rural environment and going on to the high-volume centers, the more specialized centers, when things have to be done more aggressively.

When you look at a lot of different healthcare disparities, especially in advanced diseases, a lot of them come from being in areas where technology diffusion hasn’t happened and people don’t have access to the same treatments that they do at higher volume centers.  My activation tip here is, for things like biomarker testing and advanced treatments, you need to go to the closest high volume center.


Share Your Feedback

Create your own user feedback survey

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions

Enhancing Lung Cancer Care for Black and Latinx Patients | Tackling Challenges, Implementing Solutions from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

What are challenges and solutions to quality care for Black and Latinx non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients? Expert Dr. Samuel Cykert from UNC School of Medicine discusses challenges, solutions, and proactive patient advice toward quality care.

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…for things like biomarker testing and advanced treatments, you need to go to the closest high volume center.”

Download Resource Guide | Descargar guía de recursos

See More from [ACT]IVATED Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Related Resources:

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients

Improving Biomarker Testing Access for Rural Lung Cancer Patients

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care?

How Can We Advance Equitable Access to Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Care?

What Urgent Innovations Can Advance Lung Cancer Precision Medicine?

What Urgent Innovations Can Advance Lung Cancer Precision Medicine?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Cykert, what specific challenges do Black and Latinx patients with lung cancer often encounter in advocating for themselves within the healthcare system, and how can they navigate these challenges effectively to ensure they receive equitable and quality care?

Dr. Samuel Cykert:

Yes, and in our past research we discovered that there are certain implicit biases and communication biases that affect patients of color, and because of that, I think it’s really important to approach the clinical encounter with cancer care decision-makers with enthusiasm, that meaning making a direct statement that I’m very enthusiastic about getting care for my lung cancer, I’m very enthusiastic about biomarker testing, tailored therapy, surgery and research protocols. So please consider me for all those results, and I know what I said was just a mouthful.

And even if you can remember to just start with, I’m very enthusiastic about getting treatment, and biomarker testing would be good and I’m positive about it, how do you feel about it? Engage the clinician in the conversation so they really know that you’re part of the team and they’re part of the team, and you’re ready to move toward excellent treatment and you’re willing to consider even research stuff.


Share Your Feedback

Create your own user feedback survey

Roadblocks for Black and Latinx Patients From CAR T Trial Access

Roadblocks for Black and Latinx Patients From CAR T Trial Access from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

What are CAR T-cell therapy roadblocks for Black and Latinx trial access? Expert Dr. Sikander Ailawadhi from Mayo Clinic discusses barriers that have been documented in clinical research and solutions and patient advice for overcoming barriers.

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…please seek out a specialist center that specializes not only in myeloma, but also in CAR T and in clinical trials, and even at that center, seek out the physician who has part an experience of participating in clinical trials.”

Download Guide | Descargar Guía

See More from [ACT]IVATED CAR T

Related Resources:

How Can CAR T-Cell Therapy Be Explained to Patients and Families?

How Can CAR T-Cell Therapy Be Explained to Patients and Families?

Reducing CAR T-Cell Therapy Barriers for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Reducing CAR T-Cell Therapy Barriers for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

How Are Cultural and Language Barriers to CAR T Therapy Being Addressed?

How Are Cultural and Language Barriers to CAR T Therapy Being Addressed?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Ailawadhi, there is so much promise around CAR T-cell therapy, but barriers exist. Can you speak to the roadblocks that prevent Black and Latinx patients from participating in CAR T-cell therapy trials that you have witnessed?

Dr. Sikander Ailawadhi:

Lisa, this question about healthcare disparities and access to care, especially based on patient race ethnicity, it’s very near and dear to my heart. I do a lot of work around this and also a lot of research. Not just for CAR T, data has been very clear over years and decades that in multiple myeloma and frankly, in all cancers also. Clinical trial access is dismal when it comes to African Americans and Hispanic patients. Unfortunately, a lot of that data does not even exist about Hispanic patients.

But the publications are very clear with, so we’ve had one publication of ours, and then there has been one other from national data where FDA-approved drugs clinical trials were evaluated. And it was noted that while African American patients make up about 20 percent of the U.S. myeloma population, less than 5 percent of them participated in clinical trials that led to FDA approval of myeloma drugs.

I’m not saying that is specific for CAR T. In recent years when the CAR T trials were happening, the numbers have improved a little bit. They’re still not the same numbers representing myeloma population in the US, but some improvements happened, for sure. The barriers to getting onto CAR T and clinical trials related to such resource and time intensive treatments are multifactorial.

A lot of times they are sociodemographic, patients need to take time away from work. They have to have a caregiver, they have to have appropriate insurance approvals for certain things. They have to be able to go to a center that may be close to them. These centers are hopefully going to be able to bring some other resources like social workers, navigators, et cetera, to help that patient get onto the trial. And then there is sometimes lack of awareness of CAR T, lack of awareness of clinical trials per se, clinical, and there are fears, anxiety, scares around getting on clinical research.

Lots of barriers, I think we can systematically take care of mitigating them. I would again say, just as I mentioned previously in a different context, one simple way of trying to overcome barriers or at least making attempts to overcome barriers, is to get to a center that specializes in CAR T, that specializes in clinical trials and speak with an expert, a physician who has a clinical trial track record.

Patients can research all of this, and if that falls in place, I’m sure some of these access barriers and some of these disparities can be overcome. My activation tip for this question is, please seek out a specialist center that specializes not only in myeloma, but also in CAR T and in clinical trials, and even at that center, seek out the physician who has part an experience of participating in clinical trials.


Share Your Feedback

Create your own user feedback survey

Black and Latinx AML Patients | The Impact of Cultural Beliefs

Black and Latinx AML Patients | The Impact of Cultural Beliefs from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

What impact can cultural beliefs have for Black, Latinx, and other AML patients? Expert Dr. Sara Taveras Alam from UTHealth Houston explains how experiences, cultural beliefs, and religious beliefs can impact AML care and patient advice to help inform your care provider about your viewpoint.

[ACT]IVATION Tip

“…voice your beliefs, so that your providers are aware of your goals and the barriers to care possibly and inform you better on how we can accommodate for your beliefs and improve upon the expectation that you may have from the healthcare system from previous experiences.”

Download Resource Guide | Descargar guía de recursos

See More from [ACT]IVATED AML

Related Resources:

How Can Bone Marrow Biopsies Be Used in AML Care?

How Can Bone Marrow Biopsies Be Used in AML Care?

How Do AML Patients and Outcomes Differ by Population Groups?

How Do AML Patients and Outcomes Differ by Population Groups?

AML Diagnosis Disparities | Factors Impacting Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups

Transcript: 

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Taveras, what impact do cultural beliefs and practices surrounding illness and treatment-seeking behaviors have on delays in AML diagnosis and disparities and treatment adherence within the Black and Latinx communities?

Dr. Sara Taveras Alam:

Thanks for this question. The experience that the patients may have had previously with the medical system, or that their family members or friends may have had previously with the medical system may impact their initial care. It may be initially that patients, of course, don’t know that this is what’s going on, and they think that they have some flu or viral infection, or does not know the severity of the situation, and especially if the personal or family experience with health care has not been positive, this may cause delays in presenting to tuition and obtaining a diagnosis. Unfortunately, we know that Black patients tend to be diagnosed with AML at an earlier age, and we know that they might not respond to treatment as well as their non-Hispanic white counterparts.

So it’s important to know this because young patients may not really foresee that they may be ill in this way and not seek care promptly. So with AML, the time to care is not necessarily going to cost progression of disease, but the patient may have complications from their disease by the time that we make the diagnosis and that can make things a little bit more challenging. Unfortunately also, Black and Latin communities can face higher complication rates from treatment, and that is something that we have seen in several clinical trials.

In the specific situation of Latin communities and well not only Latin communities, but other patients with strong religious beliefs and for Jehovah’s Witnesses specifically, this is a very challenging disease because patients who are Jehovah’s Witnesses do not accept transfusions and unfortunately we know that if the patients with acute myeloid leukemia are unable to be treated appropriately without transfusion. They may need transfusions because of their illness, and we know that with chemotherapy, unfortunately, the hemoglobin could get worse before they get better.

So it’s almost a guarantee that even if a patient with AML does not need a diagnosis, does not need a transfusion at presentation, it’s almost guaranteed that they will need a transfusion at some point during the course of their treatment. So this makes it very challenging for patients who have that religious belief and may require involving their religious leader and can cause a lot of conflict within their family members, unfortunately.

My activation tip for this question is to voice your beliefs, so that your providers are aware of your goals and the barriers to care possibly and inform you better on how we can accommodate for your beliefs and improve upon the expectation that you may have from the healthcare system from previous experiences.

Share Your Feedback About [ACT]IVATED AML