Tag Archive for: Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

/in , , , , , , , /by

 

Dr. John Mascarenhas discusses the evolving landscape of myelofibrosis research, emphasizing the concerted effort among researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and advocacy organizations to advance care and treatment options for patients.

Dr. John Mascarenhas is Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and the Director of the Adult Leukemia Program and Director of the Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders at Mount Sinai. Learn more about Dr. Mascarenhas.

See More from Evolve Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

Updates in Myelofibrosis Research From an Expert

Updates in Myelofibrosis Research From an Expert

 How Can You Learn More About Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials?

How Can You Learn More About Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials?

 Is Stem Cell Transplant the Only Curative Option for Myelofibrosis?

Is Stem Cell Transplant the Only Curative Option for Myelofibrosis?

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

Is there anything you’d like to add about the evolution of myelofibrosis care? What are you excited about?  

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

I always make the comment they don’t feel rare to me because I see so many patients with myelofibrosis, and it’s what I do. But I recognize in the context of lung cancer, breast cancer, other more common cancers, these can be forgotten diseases. But what has been encouraging is, between the NIH funding, for example, our research consortium, which is really geared to translating the biology into clinical trials across the country.  

Pharmaceutical interest, which is essential to providing drugs and finance to run trials. Young investigators that are coming to the field that want to make a difference, institutions that continue to support the programs, and then foundations. Whether it’s MPN Research Foundation, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, it really takes a village. And we’ve been working with the FDA to try to better understand how to develop trials that are meaningful that can get drugs approved and to the patients. 

So, it’s a concerted effort, and I’ve been enthusiastic. I remain optimistic that everyone is trying to do the same thing, achieve the same goal, and work together, and that’s the only way we’re going to be able to do it. 

Katherine Banwell:

Yeah. How long does it take for the FDA to approve a drug? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Forever. It feels like forever. It’s a long process, and for patients, it can be quite frustrating, because there’s so many steps involved. From just the original, initial steps to allow you to introduce a drug into humans, there are IND-enabling studies, so there’s a lot that goes into this.  

And then the initial studies are safety studies. They often can take quite some time. There’s a lot of scrutiny on safety, obviously, because the FDA is really charging to making sure that we do no harm, that we maintain safety for patients, so that can take a long time. And then the ultimate testing and comparison to a control arm is essential to get a drug approved. 

So, we’re looking at a timeline that can easily be a decade from the time we have a great idea, and have a drug available to us, to the time that we can prove that through the different stages, and then demonstrate that to the FDA and negotiate what a label will look like. And that is both a time-consuming process, a very expensive process, and a laborious process, but obviously an important process. 

Katherine Banwell:

Yes, and as you say, so many new drugs and therapies have become available in the last 10 years or more that really have advanced myelofibrosis care enormously. 

How Can You Learn More About Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials?

/in , , , , , , , /by

 

Dr. John Mascarenhas shares advice for patients looking to learn more about clinical trials starting with consulting a specialist. Dr. Mascarenhas also emphasizes key questions to ask, including a discussion of the benefits versus risks of participating in a potential trial. 

Dr. John Mascarenhas is Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and the Director of the Adult Leukemia Program and Director of the Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders at Mount Sinai. Learn more about Dr. Mascarenhas.

See More from Evolve Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

Myelofibrosis Clinical Trial Participation | How Does It Move Research Forward

Myelofibrosis Clinical Trial Participation | How Does It Move Research Forward?

 Considering a Myelofibrosis Clinical Trial? Questions You Should Ask

Considering a Myelofibrosis Clinical Trial? Questions You Should Ask

 Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

What about clinical trials? How can patients learn more? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Well, clinical trials is definitely a confusing area because there are many clinical trials, and some of them are relevant to some patients may be not relevant to other patients.  

So, I think two ways is, see someone who does this. So, not everyone has as their primary care provider hematologist an expert, or someone who’s dedicated to doing this. They may be in a practice where they’re in the community setting; it’s not reasonable for them to be seen at a tertiary care center. 

But if you can get there even for a consultation or an initial visit to get plugged in, I think it’s really critical to see someone who is really invested in this with research opportunities, and clinical trial availabilities. And then the other resource would be clinicaltrials.gov.  

You can go in there, you can put in your diagnosis myelofibrosis. You can even manipulate it for geography to understand what trials are in your area. 

But it is a good way of looking, just to understand what’s there. And then the MPN Research Foundation, which is very supportive of the patient community and engages them, is often a very good resource to go to, to either learn about trials or join webinars where physicians that do this will discuss, and I think that’s another excellent resource. 

Katherine Banwell:

What questions should patients ask their team about clinical trials?   

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Well, are there clinical trials for what I have? Because again, they can be very particular to where you are in the disease process, what medications you are on, what your kidney function is, things that may really influence decision-making. So, are there clinical trials, what are the clinical trials evaluating, what should I expect from them, both potentially from a positive angle, but also from a negative. What are the known toxicities, what would be the time commitment? Trials are more involved, and they’re more involved for a reason. 

I actually personally think patients do better on clinical trials than standard of care. The reason why I think that is because they are more involved. There’s a lot more oversight and eyes on you. Not just a physician perspective, but maybe more importantly, from a research nurse and research coordinator perspective. There’s a lot of regulatory burden which translates, I think, to a lot of attention to safety and assessment for advocacy.  

So, I think understanding what that looks like at any given institution, and how it will affect the patient and their caregivers from a time perspective, and obviously toxicity. But also, what is this trial trying to achieve? Does it make sense for what I’m trying to achieve? 

Katherine Banwell:

I suppose another question might be where this trial is taking place? As a myelofibrosis patient and a caregiver, are we going to have to travel to get to this clinical trial? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

I think that’s a major obstacle for a lot of patients. We’re talking about a disease that typically affects people that are in there sixth, seventh, eighth decade of life. Patients don’t all live, as I’ve said, right around a cancer center or a tertiary care center, so travel, the logistics of it, the ability to have that support available. Sometimes it’s loved ones, and adult children having to take time off of work to be able to help in that process.  

It’s a lot, and I’m particularly sensitive to it, because I work in a metropolitan area, and I realize getting in and out is not easy. And a lot of times, these trials understand that, and they build into the trials stipends and support for transportation and/or lodging which helps. It’s not perfect, but it can help at least financially, and sometimes logistically, so I would definitely inquire about what those resources are.  

And sometimes foundations also help bridge the gaps for patients to help link them to trials and facilitate that. So, it’s a super important part of engaging in a trial. 

Katherine Banwell:

And who is on the health care team that might be able to answer questions like this? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Well, for sure, the physician should be able to. But I think the most valuable resource often is the nurse and the nurse practitioner. There are usually research coordinators. These are often young people, but very bright young people, that are very invested in this that will sometimes show up at the clinic to talk to the patient or will be a phone resource that you could reach out to. So, it can really be, I think, three levels. The coordinator, the nurse or nurse practitioner, or physician assistant, and the physician. So, it really shouldn’t be one person, but a team of people that are available to you. 

Expert Outlook | New Myelofibrosis Therapies Showing Promise

/in , , , , , , , /by

 

What myelofibrosis therapies in development show promise? Dr. John Mascarenhas, a myelofibrosis researcher, reviews innovative treatments that are being combined with JAK inhibitors as well as single agent therapies that are making headway for patients with myelofibrosis. 

Dr. John Mascarenhas is Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and the Director of the Adult Leukemia Program and Director of the Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders at Mount Sinai. Learn more about Dr. Mascarenhas.

See More from Evolve Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

Primary vs Secondary Myelofibrosis | What’s the Difference

Primary vs Secondary Myelofibrosis | What’s the Difference?

 Evolving Myelofibrosis Treatment Options What You Should Know

Evolving Myelofibrosis Treatment Options: What You Should Know

 Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

The JAK inhibitor class of therapies has been around for over a decade now. What new therapies are showing promise when being studied in combination with these therapies? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

So, I think the ones that are really exciting, and there are a number. We don’t know which one is the best, but I’ll tell you the ones that I think really have potential would be drugs like pelabresib, the pan-BET inhibitor, and the MANIFEST-2 study. Even a drug called navitoclax, that isn’t going to move forward, taught us a lot. We know that pathway is important, we just have to improve upon how we’re doing this.

Drugs like selinexor (Xpovio), the XPO1 inhibitor, is ongoing in the SENTRY study. A drug called navtemadlin is a very active drug, and that’s been shown as a single agent after ruxolitinib (Jakafi) failure. But now, it’s going after those patients who are not having an optimal response with ruxolitinib, adding it on on the backend.  

So, what I really love about the way we’re doing this is, I think it’s a very thoughtful approach trying to use these really active drugs that exploit non-redundant pathways in the disease, both either up front, to really get the biggest bang for your buck, to really try to reduce the diseased burden earlier on, or to try to add on as a strategy if patients aren’t enjoying the maximum benefit from ruxolitinib. So, we are really trying to tackle it from different angles and some of these drugs really look promising. 

Katherine Banwell:

Yeah, yeah. Are there other single agent therapies that are being studied for myelofibrosis?  

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

There are. So, I’ll name two that I also think really deserve some attention. One is called TP-3654, and it’s a drug by Sumitomo that’s a PIM 1 kinase inhibitor. So, this also goes after a very specific pathway – inflammatory pathway – a signaling pathway – that is known to be an important driver of disease and has very nice data, particularly from a symptom-burden perspective. But also, again, this concept of disease modulation and reduction in cytokines in patients who’ve previously been on ruxolitinib.  

So, there’s data there where they’re going to add it on to ruxolitinib that really looks like an interesting approach forward. And then the drug I think many of us are very anxious to see results in which is ongoing, is the IMpactMF study.   

This is the randomized phase three study of imetelstat (Rytelo), which is a telomerase inhibitor and infusional agent that goes after a very important enzyme that keeps malignant cells alive and really is one of the drugs that I think has the true potential to go after the stem cell, the origin of the disease, and improve survival. It’s the only study we have had, and currently have, where the endpoint for the registration phase we’ve studied is survival. It’s patients who have failed ruxolitinib and are getting this drug as a single agent, versus best available therapy.  

A very exciting trial and really important. Whether you’re on the trial or you’re a candidate for it, it really helps us move the field forward, because it gives us essential insights into the disease and how to do better. 

Katherine Banwell:

Yeah. When it comes to the latest research and treatment, what question should patients ask their health care team about new or developing treatment options? 

 Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Well, I think every patient is different, and truly different since their biology is different, the way they present is different, their course is different. So, really, the treatment options, including the trial options, really need to be tailored to the patient. It has to make sense for that patient. It has to meet their expectations, be aligned with their goals of therapy, and balance. Balance risk with potential benefit. Patients have to understand. The physicians have to present very clearly that some trials are randomized studies, and you could get a placebo. 

And it’s often blinded, so the patient doesn’t know, the physician doesn’t know. But importantly, in some of these studies, there’s crossovers, so even if you don’t get the drug up front, you can get it in the backend. All of these things really have to be disclosed very carefully and thoughtfully, so the patient’s really making an informed decision that makes sense for them and is meeting their expectations. 

Updates in Myelofibrosis Research From an Expert

/in , , , , , , , /by
 
Dr. John Mascarenhas shares updates on myelofibrosis research. Dr. Mascarenhas highlights the shift towards combination therapies, particularly the use of JAK inhibitors alongside novel agents, with the goal of improving disease response and patient outcomes.
 
Dr. John Mascarenhas is Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and the Director of the Adult Leukemia Program and Director of the Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders at Mount Sinai. Learn more about Dr. Mascarenhas.

See More from Evolve Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

Expert Outlook | New Myelofibrosis Therapies Showing Promise

Expert Outlook | New Myelofibrosis Therapies Showing Promise

 How Can You Learn More About Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials?

How Can You Learn More About Myelofibrosis Clinical Trials?

 Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Expert Perspective | A Concerted Effort to Advance Myelofibrosis Care

Transcript:

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

My name is John Mascarenhas, I am a professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine here in New York City. I direct the Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, and I lead the adult leukemia program. But my real passion and interest is in myeloproliferative neoplasms and translational research, trying to understand the biology of the diseases and helping translate that into effective therapies in the clinic. 

Katherine Banwell:

Dr. Mascarenhas, from your perspective, what are the highlights so far this year in myelofibrosis research? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

So, I think myelofibrosis research – I’ve been in this field for about 20 years, and I’ve watched it go from a field where we had very little insight into the biology of the disease, which meant very little targeted or informed therapies to the era of JAK inhibitors.  

The first being 2011 with ruxolitinib (Jakafi), then 2019 with fedratinib, 2022 with pacritinib, and then 2023 with momelotinib (Inrebic), has really afforded us a significant advantage in trying to tailor the treatments for different patient niches to improve spleen and symptom benefit.  

And I do think that translates to a survival benefit in our patients with myelofibrosis. So, outside of bone marrow transplant, really these treatments are not curing patients, but they are addressing certain aspects of the disease. 

What I’m most excited about is the new era; the next generation of approaches that we’re seeing, and we have been seeing, and will continue to see emerge, and these include combination therapy approaches up front. So, taking those JAK inhibitors, the benefit they have, and trying to improve upon that with the addition of informed therapies, rational drugs that have pre-clinical evidence. 

Meaning, in the lab with cells from patients with animals that are engineered to have myelofibrosis, so that when we take them into the clinic, we are more confident, more informed in our decision-making, that we’re not exposing patients to drugs that really don’t have rationale.

Katherine Banwell:

What do these research advances mean for myelofibrosis patients? 

Dr. John Mascarenhas:

Well, I think what we’re seeing is a shift towards more combination therapy. So, what I think it means for a patient is deeper responses from not just spleen and symptom, but what we’re looking at very intently are biomarkers of disease modulation and disease response, hopefully, disease course changes.  

So, things like reductions in their driver mutation. These are gene mutations like JAK2, CALR, MPL, reductions in inflammatory markers, reduction in bone marrow fibrosis in the bone marrow.  

All of these things suggest that we’re really starting to modulate the disease in a more significant way. What we’re trying to show is that that actually matters to a patient, that these findings actually translate to better progression-free survival, better overall survival. So, I’m really enthusiastic and excited by what is happening now, because I do think it pays off. 

It’s incremental benefits, but things that are now more targeted, like mutant CALR antibody approaches, or BiTE approaches.  

To those patients who have this abnormal CALR protein expressed on the surface of the cell transformative with at least the potential to be JAK2 selective inhibitors, really going after that mutant JAK2 in a very selective way, or a Type II JAK2 inhibitor. Really, the potential to have very molecularly defined targeted therapies that will, hopefully, get us much deeper responses; that patients will see even greater benefits, better improvements in symptom burden, spleen, but ultimately survival.