Tag Archive for: myelodysplastic syndrome

PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Treatment: Understanding Side Effects

Ovarian cancer treatment may cause side effects, so what should patients be aware of? Expert Dr. Ramez Eskander from UC San Diego Health discusses common ovarian cancer treatment side effects, management of side effects, and proactive patient advice for optimal care. 

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…make sure you’re asking appropriate questions, that you’re educated about treatment-related side effects as they relate to PARP inhibitors. And then lastly, to understand that dose interruptions or dose reductions are an expected part of treatment with really any anti-cancer directed therapy, including PARP inhibitors, with a goal to keep patients on therapy, because they’re benefiting from this treatment.”

See More from [ACT]IVATED Ovarian Cancer

Related Resources:

Optimizing Ovarian Cancer Care: Genetic Testing and Treatment Approaches

Optimizing Ovarian Cancer Care: Genetic Testing and Treatment Approaches

Essential Genetic Testing for Personalized Gynecologic Cancer Treatment

Essential Genetic Testing for Personalized Gynecologic Cancer Treatment

What Are Common Symptoms of Ovarian Cancer

What Are Common Symptoms of Ovarian Cancer?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Eskander, what are some common side effects of ovarian cancer treatments, particularly with long-term use of PARP inhibitors, and how can patients manage these side effects and maintain their quality of life during treatment?

Dr. Ramez Eskander:

PARP inhibitors, Lisa, are a very important part of the management of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. They have become a commonly used treatment in the first line we call it therapy or when patients are initially diagnosed as a maintenance treatment strategy and those PARP inhibitors can be given alone or the PARP inhibitors can be given in combination with another drug called bevacizumab (Avastin) as maintenance therapy. PARP inhibitors is a class I like to say are drugs that can be well tolerated.

One of the most important things that we face as providers is we are responsible to make sure our patients are educated. When we are able to have a conversation with a patient and educate them about potential treatment-related side effects and they feel empowered in managing those side effects, we’re able to make sure that patients can stay on treatment, tolerate, and of course, most importantly, benefit from this study-directed therapy for management of their cancer. As a class, some of the more common side effects of PARP inhibitors are fatigue. It’s actually one of the most common side effects.

We can see gastrointestinal side effects. They can be varied, but it can be constipation or diarrhea or abdominal cramping. We can also see hematologic side effects, which means impact on the blood counts. It can cause anemia, lowering the red blood cell count, lowering the white blood cell count, and in some instances, lowering the platelet count. There are rare, when I say rare in the front line, if you look across trials, less than about 1-1/2 percent of patients can develop a secondary malignancy of the bone marrow that’s called myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. Those are very uncommon, but they have been described when we use PARP inhibitors as a maintenance strategy in the front line.

So in these circumstances, again, it’s about education. It’s about making sure that you’re asking your provider, what might I experience, and how are we going to be proactive about mitigating these side effects? And I would like to emphasize that it’s okay when needed, to have a dose interruption, meaning pause the medication for a period of time, or a dose reduction, reduce the dose.

Because by doing so, we can make sure that a patient can stay on a treatment that they tolerate. And so managing these side effects is multi-pronged. It’s your clinician, your treatment team, of course, because it goes beyond the clinician who’s caring for you. It’s about understanding that an interruption in treatment may be needed, or reduction in the dose may be required, because that helps us keep patients on treatment. 

Lisa Hatfield:

So if I understand correctly then, PARP inhibitors are something that a patient remains on until disease recurrence. That’s not a limited duration therapy, but it can be interrupted if needed a little bit of a break. So is that correct that it’s until disease recurrence?

Dr. Ramez Eskander:

In the front line when we’re talking about maintenance treatment strategy with PARP inhibitors, there’s actually a defined time period, but that defined time period is quite long on the order of two years. So you’re on a medication for a long period of time. Now, if you get to that two years, and thankfully there’s no evidence of cancer recurrence or active disease, you may be able to discontinue the PARP inhibitor.

The different trials had different durations of maintenance therapy. So you can imagine that there can be some fluctuation between trials two years or three years. But needless to say, it’s still a long period of time that you’re on an anti-cancer directed maintenance therapy. When you get to the end of that, however, you would be able to potentially discontinue treatment in conversation with your provider.

So here, in my opinion, the [ACT]IVATION tip is make sure you’re asking appropriate questions, that you’re educated about treatment-related side effects as they relate to PARP inhibitors. And then lastly, to understand that dose interruptions or dose reductions are an expected part of treatment with really any anti-cancer directed therapy, including PARP inhibitors, with a goal to keep patients on therapy, because they’re benefiting from this treatment.

Share Your Feedback

Novel Therapies and Clinical Trials for Myelofibrosis | Updates and Innovations

What’s the latest in higher risk myelofibrosis novel therapies and clinical trials? Expert Dr. Michael Grunwald from Levine Cancer Institute discusses JAK inhibitors and other research updates along with proactive patient advice for clinical trials.

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…it is okay and, in fact, encouraged for patients to ask about clinical trials, especially if patients have access to a clinical trial center where they might be able to be treated on a clinical trial.”

Download GuideDescargar Guía

See More From [ACT]IVATED Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

How Does Risk Stratification Shape Myelofibrosis Treatment

How Does Risk Stratification Shape Myelofibrosis Treatment?

Barriers to Accessing Specialized Myelofibrosis Care in Rural Areas | Challenges and Solutions

Barriers to Accessing Specialized Myelofibrosis Care in Rural Areas | Challenges and Solutions

Helping Rural Doctors Recognize Myelofibrosis | How Patients and Providers Can Work Together

Helping Rural Doctors Recognize Myelofibrosis | How Patients and Providers Can Work Together

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Grunwald, can you discuss novel therapies and current clinical trials for lower risk and higher risk myelofibrosis?

Dr. Michael Grunwald:

We’re in an exciting time in myelofibrosis because we’ve already had some new therapies introduced into the clinic in recent years and there are a number of ongoing trials that are very exciting. Some of these trials look at agents in combination with JAK inhibitors or four currently approved JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib (Jakafi) being the oldest one. And many of these trials that are ongoing will combine a novel agent.

So there’s pelabresib (CPI-0610), which is from a class of medicines called BET inhibitors, which has shown very good efficacy in reducing spleen size when it’s combined with ruxolitinib in the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with myelofibrosis. We also have navitoclax, which is an apoptosis inhibitor or a cell death inhibitor that’s been used in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) and has had promising results presented in terms of spleen reduction. There’s selinexor (Xpovio), which is a drug approved for another blood disease, multiple myeloma, and that’s being combined in trials with ruxolitinib.

And then navtemadlin as well, which is from a group of drugs called MDM2 inhibitors. Then we have drugs being looked at as a single agent. So there’s an agent called imetelstat (Rytelo) that was recently approved for a cousin of myelofibrosis called myelodysplastic syndrome or MDS, and now it’s being evaluated in myelofibrosis.

We have ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Besremi), which is approved for another MPN polycythemia vera and it’s being looked at in myelofibrosis as well. Something really exciting to me is the CALR mutant inhibitors. So many patients with myelofibrosis will have CALR mutations. Probably around 30 percent of myelofibrosis patients have that mutation. And there are some strategies being developed to try to target that mutation and kill myelofibrosis cells by targeting it. There’s a naked antibody that’s in clinical trials. There is something called a bispecific antibody that is targeting the mutation, but also trying to bring immune cells or T cells close to the tumor cells so that there’s good tumor killing by the immune system.

And finally there’s a vaccine in development to try to target this mutation. There’s also a medicine called bomedemstat (MK-3543) that’s being tested in multiple myeloproliferative neoplasms and it’s been looked at as a single agent, and I believe it’s going to be looked at as a combination with a JAK inhibitor as well. Most of those therapies are targeting intermediate and high risk MF patients. That’s where a lot of the clinical trial action is. The ropeginterferon alfa-2b study is looking at lower risk patients. And then, there are some strategies to try to improve anemia in myelofibrosis, and those strategies can also include some patients toward the lower end of the risk spectrum.

For example, there’s a drug that’s been approved for myelodysplastic syndrome to help anemia since 2019, I think it’s been, 2019 or 2020. And that’s luspatercept (Reblozyl) it’s being tested for anemia in myelofibrosis. And I think that might be a drug that would be appropriate for some patients with lower risk disease who happen to have some anemia. My [ACT]IVATION tip for this question is that it is okay and, in fact, encouraged for patients to ask about clinical trials, especially if patients have access to a clinical trial center where they might be able to be treated on a clinical trial.


Share Your Feedback

Why Is Specialized Care Important for MPN Patients?

Why Is Specialized Care Important for MPN Patients? from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

Specialized myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) care is an option for many patients. Dr. Kristen Pettit from Rogel Cancer Center explains various ways that specialized MPN care can benefit patients and MPN conditions that specialists are commonly trained in.

See More From the MPN TelemEDucation Resource Center

Related Resources:

What Does Teleoncology Mean for Myeloproliferative Care?

Notable New MPN Treatments

Understanding What ECG Monitoring Tools Mean for MPN Patients


Transcript:

Dr. Kristen Pettit:

I do think it’s important for patients to have an MPN specialist in their corner when they’re living with an MPN, that things are moving very quickly in the MPN fields in all areas, from diagnosis to risk stratification, to treatment and management over time, as well as monitoring.

So I think having someone who focuses specifically and only on MPN to is up-to-date on the most recent literature and the most recent advances, I think is an important thing, even if that’s somebody that you only maybe see either in person or virtually once a year, once every other year, or just have available if anything changes in your disease course.

So most MPNs specialists are certified in both hematology and oncology, but most focus on really all of the MPNs, these are relatively rare conditions, so most MPNs specialists will focus on ET, PV, myelofibrosis, other rare MPNs such as chronic neutrophilic leukemia, and sometimes some of the other myeloid malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndrome, for example, but your MPN doctor most likely focuses on all of those different disorders and would be able to manage your care if heaven forbid, things progress down the road from one of those MPNs to another.