Tag Archive for: MPNs

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

/in , , , , , , , /by

What can be helpful for myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom management and disease progression awareness? Expert Dr. Andrew Kuykendall from Moffitt Cancer Center discusses education tools and interventions, support resources, and the value of both community oncologists and academic centers in MPN care. 

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…I think there’s a distinct role for community oncologists and specialists, and really this should be something that works really well together.”

See More From [ACT]IVATED MPNs

Related Resources:

What's Next for Improving Quality of Life in Polycythemia Vera?

What’s Next for Improving Quality of Life in Polycythemia Vera?

 Advancing Therapies for Polycythemia Vera: Enhancing Control and Quality of Life

Advancing Therapies for Polycythemia Vera: Enhancing Control and Quality of Life

 Can Monitoring Albumin Levels Help Track Myelofibrosis Treatment Success?

Can Monitoring Albumin Levels Help Track Myelofibrosis Treatment Success?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Kuykendall, can you discuss any specific interventions or educational tools that have proven effective in improving symptom management and disease progression awareness for patients facing PV, myelofibrosis, and/or essential thrombocythemia? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

Yeah, so I mean, I think when we’re talking about symptom management, disease progression, awareness, one of the things I think is very helpful is to have an expert or specialist in your corner. And that doesn’t mean that’s the person you’re seeing every month or every two months or every three months. It means you’ve seen them one time at least, right? And you’ve been able to sit down and ask every question you have, right? It is very important as medicine gets very, very specialized.

Just the amount of information that’s out there on every single one of these disease states is impossible to keep up with. If you’re a generalist, if you’re treating everything, you just can’t be completely up to date on everything that’s going on in myeloproliferative neoplasms when you’ve got a colon cancer patient, a breast cancer patient, a pancreatic cancer patient, anemic patient coming into your clinic.

And so having that specialist in your corner really gives you that resource of asking some of these challenging questions. And I think that more than specific medications, I think what a specialist can provide is that education and that lifeline. So beyond having that specialist in your corner, I think that it’s also helpful to have a network of kind of colleagues or patients that you have as a support group or as a resource group to bounce things off of.

And so there’s a number of patient networks, whether it’s Patient Empowerment Networks or MPN Advocacy & Education International or Facebook groups or whatever it is, right? There’s a lot of different resources where patients can reach out and touch base with other patients or you know look for programs, educational awareness programs that are out there and really become an advocate for themselves and really drive their own care.

So when we’re talking about interventions, educational tools for symptom management, disease awareness, I would say seek out and have a specialist that you see at least one time that you can reach out to with any questions. And also build a network of some sort of patient group where you can access real-time education and resources and also talk with other patients about their experiences.

Lisa Hatfield:

Okay, thank you. So you mentioned having a specialist, and I also have a specialist for my particular blood cancer. I live in an area where we don’t have a multiple myeloma specialist, so I’ve had to go out of state for that. So one of my biggest fears when I did that, I have a very good oncologist locally. I did not want to offend him if I said I wanted to go seek out an expert opinion. Do you have any suggestions for patients who might be afraid to mention that to their community oncologist if they’re seeing a community oncologist? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

The first thing I’d say is that there’s probably nothing to be scared of. I think that community oncologists generally understand what specialists are there for. Honestly, it takes a bit of weight off their plate. If we spend an hour, hour-and-a-half with our patients talking about everything that comes with a diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms, I think that’s time that, they can spend on other things in their clinic.

And they usually have very busy clinic schedules. And at the same time, I think that this is usually a kind of symbiotic or mutualistic relationship where both people involved or both physicians involved can really play a role and benefit the others. So I’m in Florida, and this is a big state, right? 

For me to get to Key West is going to take a while, for me to get to Tallahassee is going to take a while. Miami is a long way away, but I have patients from Key West and Tallahassee and Miami. And now with virtual medicine, we could do a little bit more virtual, but it still doesn’t replace the seeing the patient in person. And so I would say 80 to 90 percent of my patients have a community oncologist that they see that has my cell phone number or my email address, and is encouraged to reach out to me with any questions, concerns, thoughts. And when we see patients and we come up with treatment plans, I’m usually kind of reaching out to their community oncologists to say, hey, this is what we’re trying to execute, this is the plan.

Do you want us to help with that? Are you able to take it? Let’s work on this together. And so typically this isn’t something to worry a lot about if you really are concerned, I think one way is say, hey, I’d like to see a specialist to talk about clinical trials. And honestly, that’s one of the things that community oncologists are like oh, okay. Absolutely. That’s a great reason to see them. The two most common reasons for a community oncologist to refer someone to an academic center is probably clinical trials or discussion of transplant, right? And so you could say, hey, I want to talk about transplant, or I want to talk about clinical trials, and typically that’ll be a good reason to get in the door.

So yeah, my [ACT]IVATION tip for this is, I think there’s a distinct role for community oncologists and specialists, and really this should be something that works really well together.

Share Your Feedback

What’s Next for Improving Quality of Life in Polycythemia Vera?

/in , , , , , , , /by

What are key challenges in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) care, and how do symptoms evolve over time? Expert Dr. Andrew Kuykendall from Moffitt Cancer Center discusses constitutional MPN symptoms, strategies to manage fatigue, neurovascular symptoms, and symptom management. 

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…we have a variety of symptoms that can be associated with kind of myeloproliferative neoplasms as a whole, as well as each one of these distinct disease entities. And the therapy for each of these differs based on the particular symptom.”

See More From [ACT]IVATED MPNs

Related Resources:

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

 Advancing Therapies for Polycythemia Vera: Enhancing Control and Quality of Life

Advancing Therapies for Polycythemia Vera: Enhancing Control and Quality of Life

 Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Kuykendall. I’d like you to speak to some of the key challenges in managing MPN symptoms. So based on the available treatment options, what are the most challenging symptoms associated with polycythemia vera, PV, or myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia, ET? And what are we learning about how these symptoms evolve as the disease progresses? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

When we think about myelofibrosis, that’s probably the disease we associate with the most clear, distinct symptoms. And patients often have what we call “constitutional symptoms.” And this could be fevers, chills, night sweats, bone pain, weight loss. These are classic symptoms of a disease that is really causing a lot of inflammation, right? And driving a lot of these inflammatory pathways, and these types of symptoms are quite well-addressed with JAK inhibitors, these disease specific anti-inflammatories, of which we now have four that are approved for myelofibrosis in different capacities. But there are more symptoms beyond those. I think when we think about polycythemia vera, we get less constitutional symptoms, although that certainly can be seen in a subset of patients.

But we see more itching is probably the classic polycythemia vera symptom. This itching that is quite challenging, doesn’t necessarily respond to antihistamines, and can be something that’s exacerbated by like taking hot showers or being in hot water. There’s a fancy name for it called aquagenic pruritus. And patients may not even be aware this is related to their disease. I’ve met many patients who’ve come in, who’ve been diagnosed with PV who complain of this challenge with showering or being in hot water, who really never put two and two together.

And sometimes the itching isn’t even described as itching. It feels like fire ants all over their body. And you have patients that are really avoiding right, showering. And so they’re doing it maybe once a week or once every two weeks. And so again, this is a symptom that responds quite well to ruxolitinib (Jakafi), which is approved in the second line here.

Beyond that, I think the biggest symptom across myeloproliferative neoplasms is fatigue. And I don’t have great magic tips for fatigue other than to say what we found out is probably non-pharmacologic interventions are better than pharmacologic interventions for fatigue. Things like just making sure you have good sleep hygiene, getting good sleep, healthy diet, exercise, yoga, mindfulness, resting, these probably are more successful in treating fatigue than any specific drug or agent that we have. And I think that speaks to really a failure on our part to develop better therapies. But certainly it’s something that we’re all very well aware of. And so it’s something we monitor in any of our clinical trials when we are developing agents is how does fatigue change over time? And lastly, I’d say for ET I think you can start to see some symptoms that are more kind of neurovascular.

So things like headaches, migraines, ringing in the ears, or tinnitus, or tinnitus. These can be unique to ET and may predate or preempt the actual diagnosis. So a lot of our young patients that are diagnosed with ET may come to attention of physicians because they’ve been dealing with migraines or headaches or fatigue plus migraines and headaches for a long time. Then lo and behold, blood work shows that they have a very high platelet count.

And so over time, I think when we look at these symptoms, certainly there can be waxing and waning of some symptoms, response to therapies, lack of response to therapies. But if the symptoms really do change rapidly, which we don’t see that often, oftentimes this can accompany a change in the disease, right? And that’s the time to go in and see if something’s changed. Sometimes reevaluate the disease status. And so my [ACT]IVATION tip for this is that we have a variety of symptoms that can be associated with kind of myeloproliferative neoplasms as a whole, as well as each one of these distinct disease entities. And the therapy for each of these differs based on the particular symptom.

Share Your Feedback

Advancing Therapies for Polycythemia Vera: Enhancing Control and Quality of Life

/in , , , , , , , /by

How are emerging polycythemia vera (PV) treatments addressing quality of life? Expert Dr. Andrew Kuykendall from Moffitt Cancer Center discusses disease control versus quality of life issues for PV patients and shares updates about rusfertide and hepcidin mimetic clinical trials. 

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“…there’s a lot of things that factor into a suboptimal quality of life for patients with PV. And we need to think about all of those as we try to chip away and make patients’ quality of life as good as possible.”

See More From [ACT]IVATED MPNs

Related Resources:

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

 What's Next for Improving Quality of Life in Polycythemia Vera?

What’s Next for Improving Quality of Life in Polycythemia Vera?

 Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Kuykendall, since current treatments may help control polycythemia vera but don’t significantly improve symptoms, what steps are being taken to develop new therapies that not only control PV, but also improve patients’ overall quality of life? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

Yeah, so right now the therapies we have for polycythemia vera essentially the main goal is to reduce as I tell patients, to reduce the things that could kill you, right? To reduce the risk of thrombotic events, cardiovascular events, strokes, blood clots, heart attacks, things like that. As we know that that is a huge issue for these patients that are at increased risk for cardiovascular events.

So we do that with a variety of different strategies, but I think increasingly what we’re realizing is we need to make a primary focus of treatment being on improving and maximizing quality of life. And this is something that really we should be thinking about across all malignancies. But specifically polycythemia vera (PV), where this is a disease that if we are able to avoid some of these cardiovascular events, patients have a very good quantity of life expected with their disease.

So they may live with their disease for 15, 20, 30 years. So if that’s the case, we really need to be thinking about how we can do that as best as possible, right? We’re talking about a third of your life living with this disease. And so we need to do that in a quality way. So agents like ruxolitinib (Jakafi) that have been approved for polycythemia vera in the second-line setting.

Ruxolitinib is known that it is improving some of the disease-related symptoms that come with PV, fevers, chills, itching, night sweats, bone pain really does help with those things. But I think that we can move beyond that. And we’re developing agents like rusfertide. Rusfertide is the hepcidin mimetic that is aiming to reduce the amount of phlebotomies patients need. And for me, that’s important in a variety of ways.

One if you don’t need to get phlebotomies all the time, you’re not tied to the healthcare system, right? Nearly as much. And that could be a huge dissatisfactor. And so at the same time, getting a phlebotomy is not that fun either. It requires going in and sitting there getting blood drawn, you may get lightheaded, fatigued that comes with that.

So eliminating that aspect of negative quality of life. At the same time, we’re starting to see with rusfertide whispers that it may help with some of these symptoms that may be related to iron deficiency. Things like brain fog, concentration issues, fatigue. And so if we can help a little bit with that aspect of things too, man, we could start to kind of, you know, chip away at some of the quality of life issues that are ongoing.

And then down the road, I think some of these JAK2-specific inhibitors may have the continued ability to modify the underlying disease. And certainly that’s a huge goal, right? If we can actually start to get true responses really get at the core of the disease to get the disease to go away. And I think that ultimately that will hopefully result in better quality of life as well. So, at the same time, I think my [ACT]IVATION tip for this question is that there’s a lot of things that factor into a suboptimal quality of life for patients with PV. And we need to think about all of those as we try to chip away and make patients’ quality of life as good as possible.

Lisa Hatfield:

Okay. Thank you. And is there any hope of any of these newer therapies being of limited duration, or are all of them continuous therapy? Because I know as a patient myself, that quality of life is impacted by knowing that I’ll be on therapy forever, some kind of therapy forever. Any hope for that? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

Yeah, so certainly with some agents there is hope for that. So some of the agents I referenced, ruxolitinib, rusfertide, these are agents that probably are, are going to be continued therapy. We always call it indefinite, right? As long as we think that the benefits outweigh the risks, we continue that. If we stop those, typically the reasons we’re using them, those come back quite quickly.

But I would say it’s not necessarily the case with agents like interferon. So interferon is an agent that’s less associated with symptomatic improvement, although we do see it in a subset of patients, it’s more associated with the ability to potentially modify the underlying disease. And so what we’ve seen with interferon is that we can measure patients’ JAK2 allele burdens, the number of cells that have the JAK2 mutation that drives the disease.

And in patients that are on interferon for 2, 3, 4 years, we see the number of cells that have the JAK2 mutation go down over time quite consistently. And even in the case that in some patients it goes less than 10 percent or to a level, we really can’t pick it up with our standard testing. And my experience with that is we can actually stop interferon in some of these patients for a pretty extended period of time.

So we have patients where we stopped for one or two years with blood counts that remain quite well-controlled, patients feeling well. In time, we might have to restart it as things start to to pop up, but I think that we are starting to get to these kind of at least treatment reductions, dose reductions where we can spread things out, but also kind of brief treatment interruptions where we get this kind of treatment-free period that certainly can be attractive to some patients.

Lisa Hatfield:

Okay. Thank you. And I’ll just do a quick shoutout to physicians like yourself who deal primarily with MPNs or work a lot with MPNs, that if a patient is watching this and doesn’t have somebody who really specializes in MPNs, everything you’re talking about, clinical trials, it might be helpful even to just get a consult or what I call an expert or second opinion on how to manage your MPNs. So anyway, thought I’d throw that out there. Thank you.

Share Your Feedback

Can Monitoring Albumin Levels Help Track Myelofibrosis Treatment Success?

/in , , , , , , , /by

How might albumin levels help guide myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) care? Expert Dr. Andrew Kuykendall from Moffitt Cancer Center discusses research on albumin monitoring and treatment for myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, treatment response, spleen size, and proactive patient advice. 

[ACT]IVATION TIP

“...monitor your lab work. Use everything at your fingertips to kind of get a sense for how something’s working. So whether it’s albumin level or spleen size or symptoms…really take everything into account to know if the treatment’s working for you.”

See More From [ACT]IVATED MPNs

Related Resources:

Prioritizing Quality of Life: Addressing Symptom Management Challenges in MPNs

Prioritizing Quality of Life: Addressing Symptom Management Challenges in MPNs

 Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

Empowering Patients: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care

 How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

How Can Specialists and Support Networks Improve Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care?

Transcript:

Lisa Hatfield:

Dr. Kuykendall, your research shows that changes in serum or blood albumin levels are linked to better survival in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib (Jakafi). How could this information help doctors monitor patient progress and adjust treatment plans over time? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

Yeah, so this is a bit of a passion project for me that I spent a few years looking at. Want to give a little bit of a backstory. Ruxolitinib is a JAK inhibitor that is approved for myelofibrosis as well as polycythemia vera. And what it’s able to do, the way to think about,  it’s like a disease-specific anti-inflammatory. And so the disease itself kind of ramps up these inflammatory pathways, ruxolitinib blocks those inflammatory pathways, and it improves patients’ symptoms.

It’s also been able to show kind of reduction in splenomegaly or enlarged spleen for patients, but it doesn’t really get rid of disease, right? So we’d like it to be better than it is. We’d like it to get rid of the bone marrow disease and get so-called complete response or complete remission. But we don’t see that.

However, we know that it helps a lot of patients. And I think that the challenge is knowing when it’s helping someone and when to continue it versus when should you consider alternative options? And we’ve really struggled with kind of coming up with an objective definition of how to kind of define treatment success or failure with this. And so the best data we have supports patients that have a spleen response tend to have better survival than those patients that don’t have a spleen response.

However, we’re not routinely imaging patients’ spleens in the clinic, and many patients it’s difficult to monitor their spleen kind of growth or reduction in size on exam. And so this not isn’t always the most feasible way to monitor kind of response to therapy. And symptoms…they can be variable.

Certainly if patients are feeling better, that’s a great thing, but a lot of things factor into symptoms. And so kind of on a week to week, month to month, visit to visit basis, that may be challenging. And so I was very interested in looking at albumin, which I think kind of factors into a lot of things regarding health. So patients that are more nutritionally optimized have better albumin levels, patients that have less inflammation just in general have better albumin levels and patients that are eating well have better albumin levels.

And actually I kind of harkened back to a trial that was published on ruxolitinib-treated patients that showed that patients who got ruxolitinib, their albumin levels rose over time. And that was intriguing to me, which was the thought was, okay, well if that happens, if this is something specific to ruxolitinib, does this… Is this something that that can actually define those patients that do well? 

Does this represent someone who’s able to eat better and be more nutritionally optimized? Does this represent someone who’s getting a really good anti-inflammatory benefit from ruxolitinib? And so we looked at our patients and actually combined our data sets with an Italian data set as well, and showed that those patients on ruxolitinib whose albumin either stayed the same or improved, actually derived a survival benefit compared to those whose albumin levels stayed the…or whose albumin levels decreased over time.

And that was unique to ruxolitinib when we looked at patients who weren’t treated with ruxolitinib, who had myelofibrosis, we didn’t see the same pattern. And so the reason I think this is interesting and potentially clinically relevant, is that we’re always looking at albumin levels. The albumin is involved in kind of the complete metabolic panel or the CMP that we routinely are getting on patients.

And so this is something that’s very available to physicians as they’re watching someone on ruxolitinib. And so they can look and say, oh, look from when they started till now that albumin level has gone up by a certain amount. I think this is someone who actually I do feel comfortable that they’re doing well. And alternatively, maybe it’s someone who’s on ruxolitinib whose albumin level continues to decline. And you may say, think, you may think, hey, this is maybe symbolic of a treatment that may not be doing enough right now.

Lisa Hatfield:

Okay. Thank you. And do you have an [ACT]IVATION tip for that question? 

Dr. Andrew Kuykendall:

I think my [ACT]IVATION tip for this one is monitor your lab work. Use everything at your fingertips to kind of get a sense for how something’s working. So whether it’s albumin level or spleen size or symptoms. I think the [ACT]IVATION tip here is really take everything into account to know if the treatment’s working for you.

Share Your Feedback

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

/in , , , /by

MPN experts Dr. Akriti Jain from Cleveland Clinic and Kimberly Smith from Duke Health discuss effective strategies to improve MPN care including how patient diagnosis and symptoms can vary, best practices for shared decision-making, patient-provider communication, and family support. 

Download Resource Guide

See More from EPEP MPNs

Related Resources:

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

 MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

 What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

Transcript:

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

We’re going to talk about strategies for closing the gaps in myeloproliferative neoplasm care. So I’m going to go to you first, Dr. Jain, can you describe the most effective strategies, including your own best practices that can address gaps in care for patients facing a myeloproliferative neoplasm?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Yes. So again, coming back to empowering our patient and leading to that shared medical decision-making. So different patients present differently, not using that one-size-fits-all philosophy, depending on what their symptoms are, what their diagnosis is tailoring their treatment. If cytopenias or anemia is a problem, helping them battle that. And different hemoglobins can be different for different patients. So not discounting their symptoms, saying that your hemoglobin is 11, your hemoglobin’s fine, you don’t need any treatment for this right now, maybe they’re used to functioning at a 14.

So shared medical decision-making is very important, because if patients feel like they’re heard, if patients feel like they’re a part of the decision that their healthcare provider made in helping them decide what is best for them, I think that is really important. And it would lead to patients actually adhering to treatment, following up with their healthcare provider, and also better physician-patient relationship, which I think is very important in some of these chronic diseases, where these relationships last for years, right? This is one of the chronic diseases, like a lot of times we’re telling our patients, this is like high blood pressure or diabetes, we have to learn to live with it.

And so they have to be friends with their healthcare provider, otherwise they’re not going to come see you again. So I think empowering the patient, making them a part of this decision of how we’re going to treat them, how we’re going to monitor them, how often should we be doing their labs, is it feasible for them, I think are really important ways to close those gaps and help our patients.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Thank you so much, Dr. Jain. What about you, Ms. Smith, what thoughts do you have in terms of strategies to address the gaps in care for MPN patients?

Kim Smith: I agree with Dr. Jain, but also bridging the gap between community and tertiary centers. A lot of times, we treat patients in these big centers, and then we send them out to local places to whether they need transfusions or, or to continue care because the distance for them to make it here is just too far. So I think, bridging, collaborating with the outside community hospitals and community centers, and also even the nursing staff, the nursing staff coordinating, just coordinating the care so these patients will know that they are receiving effective care, whether they are at this tertiary center or they’re at their community center, because we all are working as a team to make sure they have everything they need.

And also including the family. Families are important. That was a big thing to me. Like, I want to make sure families knew that they were a part of this team also, because a lot of times it’s the family who is having to deal with the symptom management. They’re the ones who want their family member to go somewhere with them, and they’re just too fatigued to get out, and they don’t understand it, because we’re telling them that this is a chronic disease. They should be able to do some things, but they just can’t. So I think we have to make sure we’re bridging the gap with the families also.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

So for you, Dr. Jain, are there specific strategies or maybe one strategy that you have implemented yourself, maybe where you work, that has helped to bridge that gap between tertiary care and the community setting, as an example?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Yeah, that’s a very good point brought up by Ms. Smith. So what I do, because a lot of the patients I see in my clinical practice are second opinions. A lot of these patients I see one time, and maybe I’ll never see them again, or maybe I’ll see them in two years from now when things have changed, and they have more questions, or their provider has more questions.

So what I do is I make sure the patient has my contact number so that they can always reach out if things change. I make sure they have that MyChart set up so that they can always message me if they need me. The next step that I always take is I call their primary oncologist. I make sure they have my cell phone number so that they can call me if things change, if they have any questions. And the third thing I always tell my patients is you can use me however you want to use me.

So, I, a lot of times, would set up virtual visits in three months or in six months. That way, even if they live hours away from us, they can see us the tertiary care center through the comfort of their home. They can get labs locally and see us. They can kind of alternate between their primary oncologist and a tertiary care center, or maybe see us once a year. It’s dependent on how much they feel makes them comfortable seeing us along with their primary oncologist who’s doing most of the heavy lifting, providing the care close to their homes.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

And to circle back to the family part, I’m going to go back to you, Ms. Smith. Is there a strategy that you can share that you and your team implement to really engage with the family members of MPN patients?

Kim Smith:

Yes. So we provide educational materials to the patients. We always ask them to bring a family member with them. If they can’t bring a family member with them, I’m willing to call a family member if they need information after the visit. I always give them the contact numbers that the family member can contact me also. MyChart is a big thing. Make sure they have MyChart because the family reaches out via MyChart also.

Another thing that I do is that I try to make sure that the family also has like the educational material too, because sometimes you can give it to the patient, but they don’t share it. So if a family member comes, if I pass out information to the patient, I pass it out to the family member also. I also provide them with websites that they can use, that they can utilize. Like the Cleveland Clinic is one of them that I have them use a lot, but, but websites that they can use where they can actually look up information on these different MPNs that they may have. So I think the educational piece is the biggest thing that I do with my patients.

Share Your Feedback

 

What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

/in , , , /by

In MPN management, what are some common challenges and possible solutions? Experts Dr. Akriti Jain from Cleveland Clinic and Kimberly Smith from Duke Health discuss the challenges of practice-related barriers including treatment options and navigating the logistics of treatment access. 

Download Resource Guide

See More from EPEP MPNs

Related Resources:

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

 MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Transcript:

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Ms. Smith, can you speak to some of the emerging challenges and opportunities in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms?

Kim Smith:

Well, a lot of the world of MPNs is starting to explode, especially with myelofibrosis. We are getting all these different treatments, these trials running, things hopefully that we will have that could that could change the disease process in these patients. And one of the biggest challenges is, is that where do the patients fit at in this aspect of it? Are we going to be able to actually get patients approved for some of these things or will we have to go with the oldie, but goodie with a lot of these? We still use hydroxyurea (Hydrea) a lot in these MPNs. And so, but we have a lot of other drugs now that we can use.

But because we know that it’s tried and true, and it’s harder to get patients on some of these other drugs, we go with the oldie but goodie. So I think that’s a challenge that we…that we’ll have. And the other thing is too these drugs are expensive. So even if we can get the drug form at our institution or in the community, if we can get them for them, will they be able to afford them? And one thing I can say that I’ve noticed is a lot of the drug companies that we’ve dealt with here that they are really good about helping, is there anything that we can do to kind of help push the process to get patients assistance for these therapies? And so I think that’s one of the biggest challenges that we’ll have with treating them, just this explosion of new therapies coming.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

And you kind of alluded to it when you spoke about hydroxyurea. So I’m going to pose this question to you, Dr. Jain, are there any unforeseen or outdated practice-related barriers or therapeutic inertia that may hinder your work in that of your colleagues?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Yes, definitely. I echo Ms. Smith’s sentiments. I think a lot of times, things that we have already used for years and having familiarity with those treatments sometimes can lead to resistance to accepting new guidelines and treatments. And that can come from, again, not knowing the side effects that these treatments can pose, right? Not having long-term data that these drugs haven’t been, some of them are new, they haven’t been around for years, so we don’t know what they can cause in the future. And that can happen both from the healthcare provider standpoint and also from the patient standpoint. And it can be challenging. And what can help us overcome that is education.

Even though the drugs might not be approved, for example, the newest approval that came around last year was momelotinib (Ojjaara), which is a newer drug for myelofibrosis, can help treat anemia as well. After it was approved, we had patients ask us for that drug for months before we could actually prescribe it. Yes, because FDA approval and then actually being able to prescribe the drug take…it takes some time for these drugs to show up on formularies for pharmacies to start carrying them. And then going back to, even if the drug was approved last year, it doesn’t mean it’s a new drug. It’s being tested and it is being tested in trials for years now. So those are some of the things that I can think of.

Share Your Feedback

 

MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

/in , , , /by

MPN experts Dr. Akriti Jain from Cleveland Clinic and Kimberly Smith from Duke Health discuss various treatment barriers that healthcare providers may encounter in team-based care and support solutions to help overcome barriers to optimal care.

Download Resource Guide

See More from EPEP MPNs

Related Resources:

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

 What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Transcript:

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

So we’ve been talking about the barriers that patients face, and I want to shift gears a little bit and focus on the healthcare provider. So, Dr. Jain, I’m going to start with you. Can you speak to some of the obstacles or barriers that healthcare providers face when treating MPN patients?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Sure. So being a healthcare provider and doing this, I can tell you all about the barriers we face. I think going back to that team-based care, sometimes it’s easier said than done. Like I said, we need pathology input. A lot of times we need psychology input. Other times, we need cardiology input. Some of these patients are getting blood clots, vascular medicine, so team-based care and coordination within those various physicians and nurse practitioners and social workers that can sometimes become cumbersome requires lots of phone calls.

And so in a lot of places, we try to put together these teams where you have kind of like a go-to person to call when you have questions or concerns. The other thing we always are all short on is time. So it’s easier to talk about these MPN symptoms scores, but when there are 10 questions to ask these patients within those 15 to 30 minute appointments though that’s another barrier sometimes that we face as physicians and as healthcare providers.

The other important, one of the other important parts is management of some of the side effects of these newer therapies. Every patient reacts differently. Every patient has different side effects that they can have. And knowing those and being able to manage them while keeping them on these therapies, which don’t only improve symptoms, but can also sometimes improve survival and improve the natural history of the disease can be difficult to overcome and handle.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Thank you, Dr. Jain. And what about you, Ms. Smith? Can you speak to any additional barriers that healthcare providers face?

Kim Smith:

Unlike Dr. Jain was saying, but one of the barriers that I see that that we face a lot is advocacy groups are great, they’re wonderful, we need them. But a lot of patients look at those groups, and they lump themselves into that group. And so I try to tell patients you are individual. You are individual. You need individualized care. It’s wonderful to look at the advocacy groups. It’s wonderful to follow, and you get some good information, but we also have to look at you as who you are and what we are treating and your symptoms, because your symptoms may not be the symptoms that they have.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

A really good point. And since we’ve talked about these barriers, I’d love to wrap this part of the conversation up by giving solutions. So, Dr. Jain, you mentioned a couple, you talked about having this one number for all of the how healthcare providers to call, if there are questions to kind of help to coordinate care. Are there other solutions that you or Ms. Smith can offer to start to overcome some of these barriers in care?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Sure, yeah. In addition to the multidisciplinary team that we were discussing and having, those people that we can talk to another barrier that I didn’t talk about is a lot of prior auths and having pharmacy support to get some of these medicines that can be really expensive, right? The financial toxicity that can come with some of the medicines that we manage myeloproliferative neoplasms with is hard.

So having pharmacy support is again very important. Having that specialty pharmacy that can help us navigate how to get these medicines to patients quickly and get them in an affordable manner, I think another important part that we always come back to is education. Education of those pharmacists, of patients, of other healthcare providers helping them stay on top of what new drug approvals come through, what Phase III trials are available in the community, what the side effects of these medicines are so that they are empowered to be able to help their patients out in the community and also in tertiary care centers.

Share Your Feedback

 

MPN Care Barriers | Gaps in Patient-Centered Care

/in , , , /by

What are MPN care barriers and solutions? Experts Dr. Akriti Jain from Cleveland Clinic and Kimberly Smith from Duke Health discuss common obstacles MPN patients encounter in patient-centered care, how varied factors play a role in care, and methods and approaches to support patients in empowered care.

Download Resource Guide

See More from EPEP MPNs

Related Resources:

MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

MPN Treatment Barriers | Impacts and Solutions for Healthcare Providers

 What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

What Are Key Challenges and Potential Solutions In MPN Management?

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Care Gaps | Effective Strategies to Improve Care

Transcript:

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

So I’d like to start off by talking about identifying and overcoming barriers to patient-centered care for patients and families facing a myeloproliferative neoplasm. So, Dr. Jain, I’m going to start with you. What are the most common barriers to implementing patient-centered care in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Thank you for that question, Dr. Rochester. It’s very pertinent. As you can imagine, there can be a lot of barriers when we are trying to provide patient-centered care, especially in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms. As you said, there are multiple myeloproliferative neoplasms, and each one of them is complex. And hence the complexity of each diagnosis, how they’re diagnosed, how their risk-stratified, and how those patients are symptomatic based on whether their platelets are high or their hemoglobin is high, or they have scarring or fibrosis in their bone marrow.

Then that in itself becomes complex and can become a problem when we’re seeing these patients in the community. That’s why a lot of these patients get referrals to tertiary care centers, and not all patients can have that opportunity to go to tertiary care centers and see providers that are very knowledgeable and know what…exactly how to diagnose these myeloproliferative neoplasms.

A lot of times it’s very team-based approach. It’s not just the clinician, but also the pathologist. So a lot of times when these patients come to us we have their bone marrow biopsies reviewed because the diagnostic criteria requires certain things in their bone marrow that helps us diagnose these problems. So not just that these MPN are variable, but also individual variability within the MPNs. So not every polycythemia vera patient presents the same way. So that becomes a problem again when providing patient-centered care, because it’s not the one-size-fits-all philosophy. Those are some of the things that I can think of.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Ms. Smith, I know that you share Dr. Jain’s passion with regard to really being compassionate with your patients. So I’d love to get your perspective as a nurse practitioner what are the primary barriers that you’ve witnessed to accessing effective patient-centered care?

Kim Smith:

I would say what I’ve experienced most is the patients actually understanding their disease process, the education piece, like making sure that educating them about their disease, giving them security that, hey, that you have a myeloproliferative neoplasm, but let’s look at it as we’re running a marathon, not a sprint. You know that we have time, you know that we can get family involved. And I think that’s a big thing with me, just try to bridge that barrier that it’s a team effort. It’s not just you. Even though treatment is individualized, it’s still a team. We are a team, so I want you to be comfortable, but I also want to be comfortable with giving you the information and that you are able to receive it. That’s one of the big barriers that I see is them being able to accept their diagnosis.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Wonderful. Thank you so much Ms. Smith. So, Dr. Jain, I’m going to go back to you and staying on this theme of patient-centered care. Can you talk about some of the gaps in research regarding patient-centered care in MPNs, and how can those gaps be addressed?

Dr. Akriti Jain:

Sure. So building off of what Ms. Smith was just saying, education comes, it’s very important also for research. If our patients are educated on the potential options for trials, for retrospective research, for registry research, they are more open to accepting these options for their management, for their treatment. A lot of patients might not know which phase each trial is in, and a lot of patients don’t want to be, “guinea pigs.” So sometimes it’s important for us to educate patients that some of these trials are Phase III trials, and Phase III trials eventually lead to drug approval.

So a lot of the drugs we have for myeloproliferative neoplasms were not available a few years ago. So education is very important here. And lack of education within patients and then also within healthcare providers can be a big gap in getting research to the patients where it is needed. And we’re very thankful to these patients that help us advance research and help us get these drug approvals and enroll in trials. Other important gaps are including patient-reported outcomes. As we all might know within MPNs, we have a really nice MPN symptoms core MPN-SAF, a lot of newer research trials, and other research avenues are including SAFs within the trials. And so these are important things that can help us give patients the prioritized and individualized care they need.

Dr. Nicole Rochester:

Thank you so much, Dr. Jain. Ms. Smith, do you have anything to add with regard to gaps in research regarding patient-centered MPN care?

Kim Smith:

Yes. I agree with Dr. Jain, but also another thing that I notice, with these gaps is a lot of patients come to us with other comorbidities, and so they might not qualify for trials or they might have another associated heme malignancy that they might not be able to qualify. So it kind of puts a gap in treatment, because then we have to go with what’s already FDA-approved, and that might not be the best option for the patient at that time.

Share Your Feedback

 

Emotional Health | Why It’s Vital for Myelofibrosis Patients to Share Concerns

/in , , , , , /by

Why is it crucial for myelofibrosis patients to discuss their emotional concerns with their care team? Dr. Naveen Pemmaraju explains how managing anxiety and fear is essential to maintaining overall well-being. 

Dr. Naveen Pemmaraju is Director of the Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN) Program and Professor in the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Learn more about Dr. Pemmaraju.

Download Resource Guide

See More from Elevate Myelofibrosis

Related Resources:

Myelofibrosis Care | Impact of Diet & Lifestyle Modifications

Myelofibrosis Care | Impact of Diet & Lifestyle Modifications

 Advice for Shared Decision-Making | Myelofibrosis Care and Treatment Goals

Advice for Shared Decision-Making | Myelofibrosis Care and Treatment Goals

 Myelofibrosis Symptoms and Side Effects | Why Speaking Up Is Vital

Myelofibrosis Symptoms and Side Effects | Why Speaking Up Is Vital

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

Managing the worry associated with a diagnosis or concerns about the future, and we did touch upon that earlier, it can lead to anxiety and fear. Why is it important for patients to share any worries they may be having with their care team?  

Dr. Naveen Pemmaraju:

Well, I love this question. It really wraps up everything we’re talking about here. I believe that part of the journey for the patient does include mental and psychological safety. So, it’s very difficult to make major life decisions when one is not feeling mentally, or psychologically safe. So, that’s what you’re hitting on here. Anxiety, fear, and worry, of course, are a natural and important part of the patient journey with any cancer, much less a rare cancer and blood cancer on top of that. However, sometimes in some patients, it can become so paralyzing, so overtaking, and overwhelming that it may prevent the ability of the patient to receive information, process it, and then make a decision back. Yes, we want people to have caregivers, and power of attorney, all those things are essential, but we also want people to have their own agency in aegis.  

So, I would approach this from three aspects. I really love this question because I don’t think we were addressing it head-on 10 or 15 years ago. One aspect is the disease itself. These MPNs, systemic mastocytosis, eosinophilia, myelofibrosis, PV, ET, all of these MPNs can secrete these cytokines and granules that can mess up the patient’s mindset, even just profound fatigue leading to a slowing down of the neurological process. So, I think underlying control of the disease is something that can affect this. Number two is the side effects from some of these medicines. Interferon is a great example, a wonderful class of drugs that’s been around for decades, treated for solid and liquid tumors, but it has a known side effect of causing brain fog. Some of these issues can even cause depression and anxiety in some people. So, education, mitigation, following these things with dose reduction, that’s an important part.  

A third aspect, Katherine, is actually looking with a counselor and a therapist on the spectrum of this. So, normal, adjustment disorder, depression, for example. What we’ve had as a breakthrough at our center has been the supportive palliative care team. They’ve been phenomenal. So, this is a group of doctors who’s kind of one-third internist, one-third oncologist, and one-third psychiatry support.  

So, rather than the usual consults that we used to do either to psychiatry or to social work case managers, there is this burgeoning field of supportive care medicine which has revolutionized the care, I think, particularly for solid tumor patients and now hopefully for our blood cancer patients. So, I’m able to refer patients for a variety of reasons. There’s a fatigue clinic for overwhelming fatigue. There is obviously depression, and anxiety support, either with medications, talk therapy, or both. Smoking secession for folks who are still smoking and maybe either withdrawing or quitting is causing stress.  

So, it’s a really cool science and if your center has that, that’s something to inquire about. Then lastly, as we mentioned, a nice running theme today, Katherine, is looking for other medical stuff outside of the MPN. I mentioned thyroid earlier. Remember, you have a thyroid abnormality that can cause fatigue, depression, and anxiety, right? So, what’s your TSH thyroid function, and vitamin deficiencies?  

Screening for your other well-person screening exams, looking for solid tumors, looking for other conditions that may be mimicking the MPN, or mimicking one of your other aspects. So, again, it comes down to partnership with the primary care team and looking at that. So, I think those are some of the aspects that I want to mention, but it’s such an important part of the journey. I really have to mention that as well. 

Staying [ACT]IVATED: My Journey with Myelofibrosis and the Power of Proactive Care

/in , , , , , /by

As an avid climber who made healthy choices, Jason never envisioned he would be diagnosed with myelofibrosis (MF). Watch as he shares his path to diagnosis, challenges with finding a good fit for an MF specialist, and advice for optimal care. 

See More From [ACT]IVATED MPN

Related Resources:

Engaging in Myelofibrosis Shared Decision-Making | How Patients Can Collaborate With Healthcare Providers in Treatment

Engaging in Myelofibrosis Shared Decision-Making | How Patients Can Collaborate With Healthcare Providers in Treatment

 Overcoming Barriers: Ensuring Equitable Access to Myelofibrosis Care and Clinical Trials

Overcoming Barriers: Ensuring Equitable Access to Myelofibrosis Care and Clinical Trials

 

 Novel Therapies and Clinical Trials for Myelofibrosis | Updates and Innovations

Novel Therapies and Clinical Trials for Myelofibrosis | Updates and Innovations

Transcript:

Being informed and proactive is crucial in managing myelofibrosis, a relatively unknown blood cancer. My name is Jason, and I was diagnosed with myelofibrosis at age 46. Being an avid climber and overall a healthy person, the news came as a huge shock. Now, with my experience, I want to share my story to help others who might be experiencing unusual symptoms, just as I did. My desire is to raise awareness and to stress the importance of early detection, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes for all those affected by myelofibrosis.

Even though I didn’t realize it at the time, my myelofibrosis symptoms began with fatigue and abdominal pain. I dismissed the symptoms and didn’t see my doctor until I noticed that my skin had become strangely itchy. My doctor ran a full blood panel and referred me to an academic cancer center. I was fortunate that I lived in the same city, but it made me think about what would have happened if I lived in a rural area. I received further testing followed by my diagnosis of myelofibrosis.

I was referred to a doctor who specializes in treating myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). I met with the doctor but wasn’t sure that she was going to be the best fit for me. I’m a naturally curious person, and she didn’t seem open to answering a lot of my questions. After connecting with some other myelofibrosis patients in an online support group, I decided to meet with another specialist to see if I could find a better match for my care. I was fortunate to find a good match with the next MPN specialist. I’ve been under his care since, which started with active surveillance followed by an autologous stem cell transplant. My transplant was incredibly challenging, but my myelofibrosis support group was always there for me with words of support and taking action to support both my wife and me during my treatment journey.

Following my experience with myelofibrosis, I’ve become dedicated to educating others about its unique symptoms to raise awareness of this type of blood cancer. Like me, you can empower yourself by connecting with patient advocates and support groups that can assist you in navigating your healthcare journey.

Stay [ACT]IVATED in your myelofibrosis care with these tips:

  • Ask your care team questions to learn about the status of your treatment options, and what to expect during and after treatment.
  • Join a patient support group to offer and to receive emotional support. This was a saving grace for me and my family.

These actions for me were key to staying [ACT]IVATED in my myelofibrosis care.

Share Your Feedback

Evolving Myelofibrosis Treatment Options: What You Should Know Resource Guide

/in , , , , , , , /by

Download Resource Guide

PEN-193_EvolveMF_ResourceGuide_032124

Download Resource Guide

See More from Evolve Myelofibrosis

 

Thriving with an Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Resource Guide

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Download Resource Guide

PEN-187_MPNThrive2023_Guide

Download Resource Guide

See More from Thrive MPN

How Molecular Markers Affect MPN Treatment | Advances in Research

/in , , , , , , , /by

How Molecular Markers Affect MPN Treatment | Advances in Research from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

Are there new molecular markers being discovered that could affect myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) care? Dr. Lucia Masarova explains common MPN driver mutations and what researchers are learning about recently discovered molecular markers, such as ASXL1.

Dr. Lucia Masarova is an MPN Specialist and Assistant Professor in the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Learn more about Dr. Masarova.

See More From Thrive MPNs

 

Related Programs:

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

 Myelofibrosis Therapies in Clinical Trials | BET Inhibitors

Myelofibrosis Therapies in Clinical Trials | BET Inhibitors

 Expert Perspective | Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera

Expert Perspective | Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

Dr. Masarova, molecular testing is important for people diagnosed with MPNs and may help provide insight into effective treatment approaches. What are some new areas of research related to molecular markers? 

Dr. Lucia Masarova:

Molecular markers are very relevant in our designs or thinking about myeloproliferative neoplasms. Not only treatments, but also the disease qualification or prognostication wherever since the discovery of the so-called driver mutations, which are the mutations responsible for the overproduction of the blood counts and disease pathogenesis.  

Among them we have the most common, JAK2 mutation, then also calreticulin, MPL, or in some instances we don’t even understand and call it triple-negative. 

There we have learned, over the years, that the amount of the expression, or allele burden, does correlate with the disease behavior outcome. And then our ability to reverse that. So, a chief decrease of the burden is also relevant to the outcome of the patients. So, developing therapies or even putting these as an endpoint for clinical trials is important for our decision-making and moving towards eradication of the disease.  

Then there are additional molecular changes, which include non-drivers, which are additional mutations that we have learned and even implemented in the latest prognostic models, some of them are very unfavorable, such as ASXL1, Ezh2, IDH mutations, certain splicing factors.  

And those play additional roles, a lot of it we still do not understand, in how the disease is going to ultimately behave. What is their interplay, and how we can interfere with that?  

So, learning about the impact of these mutations and the drivers and the other effects that cause the disease evolution will probably become the landmark of this decade and in facing myeloproliferative neoplasms. 

And I’m hoping we will develop medications, or we will be able to focus our efforts and our decision-making based on molecular definition, as it’s currently very broadly seen across all cancers. We call it precision medicine where we really define, “How does this look like,” not how we box it in based on morphology. What is it driving? What is it not responding? And what can we do to improve that?  

So, I totally see here a big potent and powerful tool to allow us to make the most individualized and customized decisions for our patients to offer them the best outcomes.  

Expert Perspective | Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera

/in , , , , , , , /by

Expert Perspective | Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

Is it possible to change the course of disease in polycythemia vera patients? MPN specialist and researcher Dr. Lucia Masarova shares an overview of the research in disease modification, discussing her work as the coauthor in an article entitled Moving Towards Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera, recently published in the journal Blood.

Dr. Lucia Masarova is an MPN Specialist and Assistant Professor in the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Learn more about Dr. Masarova. 

 

Related Programs:

Are There Predictors That an MPN May Be Progressing

Are There Predictors That an MPN May Be Progressing?

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

 How Molecular Markers Affect MPN Treatment | Advances in Research

How Molecular Markers Affect MPN Treatment | Advances in Research

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

Dr. Masarova, you are a coauthor in an article entitled Moving Towards Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera, which was recently published in the journal Blood. Can you share some of the highlights of the article and what it means for PV patients? 

Dr. Lucia Masarova:

Disease modification in polycythemia vera. I’m so excited finally being talking about this because we’ve been really, really, really so hungry for this term, although we still don’t know what it means.  

So, we group together with lots of experts in the myeloproliferative neoplasm field and try to brainstorm and put together, “What does it actually mean?” And to me, and to all of us, it was to offer our patients the normal or not-normal lifespan without the consequences of the disease that they face. Because we historically divided polycythemia vera into high-risk or low-risk disease based on the age or previous history of thrombosis or clotting complications.  

However, there is a huge area of patients that wouldn’t have either, and still suffer tremendously a bad quality of life, and ultimately also face the disease progression to myelofibrosis, which is the most actual complication of long-term polycythemia vera duration.  

So, the concept of disease modification would be to actually prevent the complications to even occur. To allow our patient to live free of having the fear of living with a thrombosis or clotting complication or ultimately progress into myelofibrosis. We have to learn how to get there. What are the relevant endpoints of tools for us to utilize to really understand? We have learned a lot from seeing what we call molecular remissions, or control of the JAK2 mutation with certain medications, for example, interferons or latest ruxolitinib (Jakafi), the JAK inhibition, where the decrease of the allele burden, which represents the disease, is correlated with better outcome.  

So, that is something that we have to be learning down the road with a longer follow-up. But that basically triggered us to focus on what can we do better? How do we prevent this from even happening rather than only controlling the historically main points of the disease which are presented by the blood counts symptoms and display? And where we are actually failing quite a lot of patients because despite them having a control count, they still don’t have a happy life, and lots of them suffer and complain.  

So, this is something to be learned, and this is opening the disease modification not only for polycythemia vera, but also for all patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, which have a little bit of a different feeling in the whole myeloid malignancies field. Because it is a very long disease, and it could evolve and change, and only now we starting to understand what does actually happen there. Why some people could live for 30 years, and never face any consequences, and the others would progress very fast? 

So, disease modification would normally allow us to develop and learn more tools and better biomarkers, but also focus on drugs that are really needed to help with these long-term outcomes of our patients.  

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

/in , , , , , , , /by

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates from Patient Empowerment Network on Vimeo.

Dr. Lucia Masarova, a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) specialist and researcher, discusses the latest updates from a recent MPN Congress. Some of the highlights include new learnings in hematopoiesis, JAK inhibitor comparisons, interferon therapy, and the potential for combination treatments in the future.

Dr. Lucia Masarova is an MPN Specialist and Assistant Professor in the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Learn more about Dr. Masarova.

See More From Thrive MPNs

 

Related Programs:

Are There Predictors That an MPN May Be Progressing

Are There Predictors That an MPN May Be Progressing?

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm News and Research Updates

 Advances in Research | Emerging MPN Therapies on the Horizon

Advances in Research | Emerging MPN Therapies on the Horizon 

Transcript:

Katherine Banwell:

Dr. Masarova, you were in New York recently for the MPN congress. Can you share some highlights from that meeting? 

Dr. Lucia Masarova:

Yeah. Sure. That was a very interesting and very loaded conference full of experts and great data. I really liked the overall excellent update of all the therapies that currently exist in the MPN space, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, myelofibrosis. So, really a broad breadth of JAK inhibitors, their current sequencing, combinations, interferon update. I very much like also the focus of the novel therapies, which actually talked about, for example, the development of the antibody against mutant calreticulin, PIM inhibitors, and a couple others. They are very promising in the space. 

There were also very, very relevant clinical data. I think I really, really enjoyed the radiation in hematopoiesis topic. It spurred lots of discussions in the room. And also, fantastic talks about clonal hematopoiesis and its role in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and cancers.  

Overall, very great data on artificial intelligence because that will be a very needed tool, but also a very worrisome tool, at this point, until you learn how to use it to help our patients. But that showed a very promising effect and ability for us to, for example, predict thrombosis risk in polycythemia vera patients or to distinguish patients with ET versus prefibrotic myelofibrosis, which is still subject to lots of basically subjective analysis from hematopathologist.  

And also, the poster section was quite striking and really excellent. You could walk around and see so many interesting data. The match and direct comparisons of JAK inhibitors, particularly the latest approved, momelotinib (Ojjaara), as it compared to safety data which do currently exist in fedratinib (Inrebic) or pacritinib (Vonjo). 

Katherine Banwell:

When it comes to MPN research and emerging treatment options, what are you excited about specifically? 

Dr. Lucia Masarova:

There is a lot of excitement in the field currently, and it really depends how we put these patients in, as I would call, boxes, but I don’t like the term. We have these less aggressive diseases, such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia.  

Where I’m really excited about the role of interferon, with the approval of ropeginterferon (Besremi), or ropeginterferon in United States as well as Europe, we have opened a door for learning how can we do better.  

It is approved for polycythemia vera patients. There are currently clinical trials running in essential thrombocythemia patients, within patients with prefibrotic myelofibrosis. That’s an agent that has an ability to go after the disease clone and hopefully, hopefully eradicate or prevent it. Especially, especially exciting in the terms of preventing it for progression.  

Then iron metabolize modifier, hepcidin mimetics, other agents impacting this. It’s very important we finally learn how iron plays the role in these patients and how we can actually improve. Very important area in helping patients requiring phlebotomies and hopefully, hopefully altering the whole disease outcome in the long-term. 

For myelofibrosis we live in an era of JAK inhibitors. We are so excited to have four currently approved and we’re looking forward to the combinations where we have now safer and less cytopenic agents that have a role in anemia or thrombocytopenia and hopefully will be able to be combined with others. 

So, we could even move the field more into other hematologic malignancies, where in myeloma we use five, six, seven, eight drugs. For myelofibrosis, we still have one. So, I think we have still a lot to do. 

And then non-JAK inhibitor combination. Non-JAK inhibitor, a compounds or mechanism of action really tailored to the disease pathogenesis. Calreticulin, excellent topic, which I’m saying maybe in couple years we will be really classifying myeloproliferative neoplasm calreticulin-mutated, but also JAK2-mutated, and we will not be calling them one because hopefully we will find a tool to eradicate calreticulin and to really be able to offer ultimate – what I call ultimate cure.  

So, that’ll be something really exciting to come and all of these investigators in MPN fields are so eager to see what – whether the preclinical data we have seen are going to stand in our patients. And that would be really fantastic.